Praxema TSPU
  • RU
  • EN
Today: 03.07.2022
Home Issues 2015 Year Issue №1 MONUMENTAL SCULPTURE AS A VISUAL DECONSTRUCTION OF “RUSSIA”
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Issues
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
  • Rating
  • Search
  • About Publisher
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Council
  • Regular journal reviewers
  • Information for Authors
  • Peer-reviewing procedure
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Place article
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance

Journal TSPU

vestnik.tspu.edu.ru
praxema.tspu.edu.ru
ling.tspu.edu.ru
npo.tspu.edu.ru
edujournal.tspu.edu.ru

Яндекс.Метрика

Praxema Our partners

Journal on the history of ancient pedagogical culture
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -

MONUMENTAL SCULPTURE AS A VISUAL DECONSTRUCTION OF “RUSSIA”

Shcherbinina N. G.

Information About Author:

The paper deals with the problems of bringing sense into political communication that is performed in semiotic understandable language of monumental sculpture. The core of such a communication is to construct the semantic world that acquired a linguistic form of heroic political myth in our political culture. But J. Derrida’s method allows us to confirm that during the institutionalization of visual images the deconstruction of Russia as a sign takes place. In the paper some examples of this kind of “game” of political symbolics are given. In general, there are two main visual forms of monumental designation of Russia: these are the heroic symbolization of political power and the implementation of “national unity idea”. Both forms demonstrate the deconstruction of the sign “Russia” in text and in context sense. As a consequence visual phenomena have lost namely the communicative properties

Keywords: deconstruction, visual political communication, language of monumental sculpture, semantic world, difference, text, context, sign, Russia.

References:

Derrida 2000 – Derrida J. Writing and Difference. Translation into Russian. Saint Petersburg, 2000. URL: www.gumer.info/bogoslov_Buks/Philos/derrpism/.

Lotman 2001 – Lotman Yu. M. Culture and Explosion. Lotman Yu. M. Semiosphere. Saint-Petersburg, 2001. Pp. 11–148. In Russian.

Medvedev 1995 – Medvedev S. A. USSR: the deconstruction of the text. Other. Anthology of the new Russian identity. Moscow, 1995. URL: http://old.russ.ru/antolog/inoe/medved.htm. In Russian.

Nikolaeva 2001 – Nikolaeva E. V. Transition culture and the myth of the initial time. Between society and power: mass genres from the 20s to the 80s of XX century. Moscow, 2001. Pp. 301–326. In Russian.

Romashko 2002 – Romashko S. Monument – souvenir – evidence: time axis of megaopolis. Logos. 2002. 3–4 (34). Pp. 97–108. In Russian.

Ryklin 2002 – Ryklin M. Jubilation’s spaces. Totalitarianism and difference. Moscow, 2002. In Russian.

Sandomirskaya 2001 – Sandomirskaya I. The book is about the motherland. Experience in the analysis of discursive practices. Wien, 2001. In Russian.

Walking 2010 – Walking in Moscow: Yury Dolgoruky Monument. URL: http://moscowwalks.ru/2010/03/17/pamyatnik-yuriyu-dolgorukomu/. In Russian.

Wood 2003 – Wood S. Urban image and visual story: The Campus Martius in the time of Augustus. Translation into Russian by S. E. Tariverdieva. URL: http://ancientrome.ru/publik/article.htm?a=1309046977.

scherbinina_n._g._43_50_1_3_2015.pdf ( 188.94 kB ) scherbinina_n._g._43_50_1_3_2015.zip ( 182.45 kB )

Issue: 1, 2015

Series of issue: Issue 3

Rubric: RESEARCH REPORTS

Pages: 43 — 50

Downloads: 729

For citation:


© 2022 ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU