Praxema TSPU
  • RU
  • EN
Today: 03.07.2022
Home Issues 2015 Year Issue №1 URBAN SPACE AS THE SYSTEM OF VISUAL DISCOURSE MARKERS
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Issues
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
  • Rating
  • Search
  • About Publisher
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Council
  • Regular journal reviewers
  • Information for Authors
  • Peer-reviewing procedure
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Place article
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance

Journal TSPU

vestnik.tspu.edu.ru
praxema.tspu.edu.ru
ling.tspu.edu.ru
npo.tspu.edu.ru
edujournal.tspu.edu.ru

Яндекс.Метрика

Praxema Our partners

Journal on the history of ancient pedagogical culture
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -

URBAN SPACE AS THE SYSTEM OF VISUAL DISCOURSE MARKERS

Fedorov V. V., Levikov A. V.

Information About Author:

The urban environment is organized on the basis of the functional relationships, meaning-ful linking buildings and structures into a a single whole. In it visual discourse markers are present – multifunctional elements, wich are deprive of denotation, but influence to the process of perception and understanding of the environment. Small architectural forms are considered as an example of discourse markers in the urban environment.

Keywords: urban environment, small forms, visual discourse markers

References:

Bekhtel 2005 – Bekhtel E. E., Bekhtel A. E. Contextual recognition. Saint-Petersburg, 2005. In Russian.

Fedorov et al. 2013 – Fedorov V. V., Davydov V. A., Skibina E. V. Small forms in the structure of architectural text. Architecture and construction in Russia. 2013. 6. Pp. 24–29. In Russian.

Karasik et al. 2005 – Karasik V. I., Prokhvacheva O. G., Zubkova Ya. V., Grabarova E. V. Different mentality. Moscow, 2005. In Russian.

Nekrasov 1994 – Nekrasov A. I. Theory of architecture. Moscow, 1994. In Russian.

Sztompka 1996 – Sztompka P. The Sociology of Social Change. Translation into Russian. Moscow, 1996.

Tarasov, Sosnova 1985 – Tarasov E. F., Sosnova M. L. On the forms of text’s existence. Verbal communication: goals, motives, means. Moscow, 1985. Pp. 30–44. In Russian.

fedorov_v._v._51_55_1_3_2015.pdf ( 160.45 kB ) fedorov_v._v._51_55_1_3_2015.zip ( 155.09 kB )

Issue: 1, 2015

Series of issue: Issue 3

Rubric: RESEARCH REPORTS

Pages: 51 — 55

Downloads: 762

For citation:


© 2022 ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU