Praxema TSPU
  • RU
  • EN
Today: 16.01.2021
Home Archive 2015 Year Issue №2 TRANSITING FROM PERCEPTION TO DOCUMENT (FUNCTIONAL AND GENETIC STRUCTURE OF VISUAL ANTHROPOLOGY MEDIUM)
  • Home
  • Archive
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
  • Rating
  • Search
  • About Publisher
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Council
  • Regular journal reviewers
  • Information for Authors
  • Peer-reviewing procedure
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Place article
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance

Journal TSPU

vestnik.tspu.edu.ru
praxema.tspu.edu.ru
ling.tspu.edu.ru
npo.tspu.edu.ru

Яндекс.Метрика

Praxema Our partners

Journal on the history of ancient pedagogical culture
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -

TRANSITING FROM PERCEPTION TO DOCUMENT (FUNCTIONAL AND GENETIC STRUCTURE OF VISUAL ANTHROPOLOGY MEDIUM)

Aleksandrov E. V.

Information About Author:

The article consists of three interrelated parts. The first one establishes promising visual anthropology’s future in light of expanding anthropological theory. The second part defines the functioning of visual anthropology and emphasizes the creation of pointed specific screen materials – a medium between specified culture and viewing public. Moral responsibility seems the important attribute that determines a very visual-anthropology function during all stages. The third part attempts to reveal connections between the structure of visual messages regarding anthropology substance and general modern worldview.

Keywords: Visual Anthropology, documentary film, moral responsibility of anthropologist, cultures’ dialog

References:

Aleksandrov 1997 – Aleksandrov E. V. The system of visual anthropology in Russia: steps of “immersion” and problems. The material base of culture. Is. 1. Moscow, 1997. P. 60–65. In Russian.

Aleksandrov 2007 – Aleksandrov E. V. Instead reviews. In search of the object of visual anthropology. Anthropological Forum. 2007. 7. P. 9–20. In Russian.

Bataeva 2008 – Bataeva E. V. On the “smart iconography” of the New Testament myth. Saint-Petersburg, 2008. URL: http://esxatos.com/bataeva-ob-umnoy-ikonografii-mifa. In Russian.

Bogdanov 2014 – Bogdanov K. A. Philology and Anthropology: the study of literature in the Internet era. Russian literature. 2014. 1. P. 5–17. In Russian.

Collier 1967 – Collier J. Jr. Visual Anthropology: Photography as a Research Method. New York, 1967.

Genisaretsky 1986 – Genisaretsky O. I. YamalStream (Notes to the Humanitarian Symposium “Opening and communicability of cultures”). Humanities Symposium “Opening and communicability of cultures”. Moscow, 1986. P. 97–110. In Russian.

Iarskaia-Smirnova and oth. 2007 – Visual Anthropology: new perspectives on social reality. Ed. by E. R. Iarskaia-Smirnova, P. V. Romanov, V. L. Krutkin. Saratov, 2007. In Russian.

Nikishenkov 2010 – Nikishenkov A. A. Visual ethnographic materials. 2010. URL: http://www.lomonosov-fund.ru/enc/ru/encyclopedia:0134772:article. In Russian.

Pink 2007 – Pink S. Forum: Visual Anthropology. Anthropological Forum. 2007. 7. P. 68–78. In Russian.

Podoroga 2000 – Podoroga V. Visual Anthropology Workshop. 1993–1994. Moscow, 2000. URL: http://belyprize.ru/?pid=88. In Russian.

Rokityansky 1986 – Rokityansky V. The time of the meeting. Ethnographer and the “other”: the logic of ethnographic self-consciousness in the XX century. Humanities Symposium “Opening and communicability of cultures”. Moscow, 1986. P. 49–59. In Russian.

Shukurov 2007 – Shukurov Sh. Visual Anthropology: Spatial vision and methods of representation of man. Works of the Department of Historical and Philological Sciences RAS. 2006. Moscow, 2007. URL: www.intelros.ru. In Russian.

Worth 1985 – Worth S. The Development of a Semiotic of Film. Moscow, 1985. P. 133–175.

aleksandrov_e._v._55_68_2_4_2015.pdf ( 354.63 kB ) aleksandrov_e._v._55_68_2_4_2015.zip ( 345.03 kB )

Issue: 2, 2015

Series of issue: Issue 4

Rubric: ARTICLES

Pages: 55 — 68

Downloads: 506

© 2021 ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU