Praxema TSPU
  • RU
  • EN
Today: 11.08.2022
Home Issues 2015 Year Issue №4 FROM VISUAL ENVIRONMENT TO VISUAL ANTHROPOLOGY
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Issues
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
  • Rating
  • Search
  • About Publisher
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Council
  • Regular journal reviewers
  • Information for Authors
  • Peer-reviewing procedure
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Place article
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance

Journal TSPU

vestnik.tspu.edu.ru
praxema.tspu.edu.ru
ling.tspu.edu.ru
npo.tspu.edu.ru
edujournal.tspu.edu.ru

Яндекс.Метрика

Praxema Our partners

Journal on the history of ancient pedagogical culture
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -

FROM VISUAL ENVIRONMENT TO VISUAL ANTHROPOLOGY

Haydarova G. R.

Information About Author:

In the article on the example of the photographic project presented the concept of personal visual defence. In modern war of images is important a rationalization. In the situation of uncontrollable and addictive stream of images, the solution is not in increduility to the images and iconoclasm, but, as shown by the individual searching of the artist and his unique way of seeing, in recoding popular and often shocking images and concepts. Only image, reduced to functions, whether political or economic, is militant, but by itself, it is material for our imaginary. The entity of iconoclasm is not in the struggle against image, aspiring to the Ideal, but in the struggle for human, for his presence, immanent to the image, for his protective and life-giving support of the Ideal.

Keywords: the war of images, photos, media war, visual ecology, visual security

References:

Marquard 2001 – Marquard О. Art as counterfiction – the experience about transformation of real into fictitious. Translation into Russian. German philosophical study of literature today. Anthology. Saint Petersburg, 2001. P. 217–242.

Eickhoff 1997 – Eickhoff H. Sitzen. Vom Menschen. Handbuch Historische Anthropologie. Hg. Christoph Wulf. Weinheim, Basel, 1997. S. 489–500.

haydarova_g._r._92_99_4_6_2015.pdf ( 1.79 MB ) haydarova_g._r._92_99_4_6_2015.zip ( 1.78 MB )

Issue: 4, 2015

Series of issue: Issue 6

Rubric: ARTICLES

Pages: 92 — 99

Downloads: 534

For citation:


© 2022 ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU