MILITARY METAPHOR IN THE LANGUAGE PICTURE OF THE WORLD OF MEDICINE: YESTERDAY, TODAY, TOMORROW
DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2021-3-153-175
Traditionally, medicine was considered to be a territory of mercy, which the patient turned to not only for treatment, but also for moral support and compassion. Recently, however, patients and society as a whole have been increasingly confronted with the fact that medical professionals do not respond to this request: medical care has become a service, and patients are less and less likely to find comfort and consolation in the words of a doctor. Future doctors often lose the ability to respond to other people’s pain and to empathize at the stage of training when they absorb the specific atmosphere of the medical world, join its culture. One element of this culture is the language that doctors, as well as laypeople if they are concerned with medical issues, speak and write. An important element of any language is its metaphors. By analyzing the use of metaphors in medical discourse, one can get an idea of the linguistic world of medicine, and of the medical world as a whole. It is quite revealing that one of the most common metaphors in medical discourse is the military metaphor. Like any metaphor, it not only reflects, but also forms a picture of the world in people’s minds, playing both positive and negative roles. Its negative impact on the general atmosphere of the medical world has been recognized to be so significant that there is an increasing tendency to suggest that its use in medical discourse should be abandoned, and it should be replaced by metaphors of cooperation and harmony. The first among them is the metaphor of a journey, which nowadays enters quite organically into medical discourse. This metaphor allows the patient to comprehend their long life with an incurable disease, and the doctor to find their role of an older fellow traveler, instructor, guide in this journey; communication of the former with the latter may have a therapeutic effect. By analyzing the use of the military metaphor in medical discourse in a temporal context, we can conclude that “yesterday” it allowed us to create a more or less adequate picture of the medical world in the minds of people, “today”, not keeping pace with the changes occurring in this sphere, it begins to introduce distortion, from which both patients and medical staff, as well as society as a whole, suffer; therefore, “tomorrow” its use in medical discourse will most likely decrease, giving way to metaphors of peace, unity and harmony.
Keywords: medical discourse, military metaphor, metaphorical violence, metaphor of journey
References:
Annas, G. J. (1995). Reframing the debate on health care reform by replacing our metaphors. The New England Journal of Medicine, 332(11), 744–748.
Bleakley, A. (2017). Thinking with metaphors in medicine: The state of the art. Routledge.
Bleakley, A., Marshall, R., & Levine, D. (2014). He drove forward with a yell: Anger in medicine and Homer. Medical Humanities, 40(1), 22–30.
Borisov, E. V. et al. (2019). Problemy sovremennoy filosofii yazyka [Problems of modern philosophy of language]. Tomsk State University.
Degner, L. F., Hack, T., O’Neil, J., & Kristjanson, L. J. (2003). A new approach to eliciting meaning in the context of breast cancer. Cancer Nursing, 26(3), 169–178.
Donne, J. (1941). Death’s duel. The complete poetry and selected prose of John Donne (pp. 390–427). http://www.upword.com/donne/deaths-duel.html
Donskikh, O. A. (2015). Metaphor as a way to change coordinates. ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Problemy vizual’noy semiotiki – ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics, 1, 29–35. (In Russian).
Fuks, A. (2009). The military metaphors of modern medicine. In Zhenyi Li, & Th. L. Long (Eds.), The meaning management challenge: making sense of health, illness, and disease. Inter-Disciplinary Press.
George, D. R., Whitehouse, E. R., & Whitehouse, P. J. (2016). Asking more of our metaphors: narrative strategies to end the “war on Alzheimer’s” and humanize cognitive aging. The American Journal of Bioethics, 16(10), 22–24.
Gorbuleva, M. S., & Pervushina, N. A. (2020). Bioethical measurement of social demand for creative education. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, 58, 278–282. (In Russian). http://dx.doi.org/10.17223/1998863X/58/26
Gorbuleva, M. S., Melik-Gaykazyan, I. V., & Pervushina, N. A. (2020). Pedagogical bioethics initiatives. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii – Higher Education in Russia, 29(6), 122–128. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2020-6-122-128
Hauser, D. J., & Schwarz, N. (2015). The war on prevention: Bellicose cancer metaphors hurt (some) prevention intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(1), 66–77.
Hodgkin, P. (1985). Medicine is war: And other medical metaphors. British Medical Journal (Clinical Research ed.), 291(6511), 1820–1821.
Kirklin, D. (2001). Metaphors for medicine: Revealing reflections or just popular parodies? Medical Humanities, 27(2), 89.
Knyazeva, E. N. (2014). Cognition as a sense-making activity: At the crossroad of biosemiotics and cognitive science. ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Problemy vizual’noy semiotiki – ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics, 2, 26–44. (In Russian).
Kondrat’eva, O. N. (2011). Мilitary metaphor and its role in conceptualization of man’s inner world (Оn a material of the literature of early Russia). Vestnik voennogo universiteta, 2(26), 54–57. (In Russian).
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2004). Metafory, kotorymi my zhivem [Metaphors we live by]. Translated from English by A.N. Baranov. 2nd edition. Editorial URSS.
Lane, H. P., McLachlan, S. A., & Philip, J. (2013). The war against dementia: Ae we battle weary yet? Age and Ageing, 42(3), 281–283.
Lerner, B. H. (2001). The breast cancer wars: Fear, hope, and the pursuit of a cure in twentieth-century America. Oxford University Press.
Malm, H. (2016). Military metaphors and their contribution to the problems of overdiagnosis and overtreatment in the “war” against cancer. The American Journal of Bioethics, 16(10), 19–21.
Musolff, A. (2016). Political metaphor analysis: Discourse and scenarios. Bloomsbury Academic.
Nie, J. B. et al. (2016). Healing without waging war: beyond military metaphors in medicine and HIV cure research. The American Journal of Bioethics, 16(10), 3–11.
Nisbett, R., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2011). Сulture and systems of thought: Comparison of holistic and analytic cognition. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal – Psychological Journal, 32(1), 55–86. (In Russian).
O’Keefe, M. et al. (2015). “Editing” genes: A case study about how language matters in bioethics. The American Journal of Bioethics, 15(12), 3–10.
Ortega y Gasset, J. (1990). Dve velikie metafory. K dvukhsotletiyu so dnya rozhdeniya Kanta [Two great metaphors. On the bicentennial of the birth of Kant]. Translated from Spanish by N. D. Arutyunova. In N. D. Arutyunova (Ed.), Teoriya metafory [The theory of metaphor]. Progress.
Osborn, M. (1967). Archetypal metaphor in rhetoric: The light‐dark family. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 53(2), 115–126.
Reisfield, G. M., & Wilson, G. R. (2004). Use of metaphor in the discourse on cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 22(19), 4024–4027.
Scherer, A. M., Scherer, L. D., & Fagerlin, A. (2015). Getting ahead of illness: using metaphors to influence medical decision making. Medical Decision Making, 35(1), 37-45.
Shul’man, E. M., & Kutuzova, A. A. (2020). Changing demand for education as a reflection of the transformation of the social norm. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, 58, 293–296. (In Russian). 10.17223/1998863Х/58/29
Sontag, S. (1990). Illness as metaphor and AIDS and its metaphors. Anchor.
Tangwa, G. B. (2010). Elements of African bioethics in a Western frame. African Books Collective.
Tishchenko, P. D., & Yudin, B. G. (2015). Finest hour of philosophy. Voprosy filosofii, 12, 198–203. (In Russian).
( 357.63 kB ) 
( 351.68 kB )
Issue: 3, 2021
Series of issue: Issue 3
Rubric: ARTICLES
Pages: 153 — 175
Downloads: 713