Praxema TSPU
RU EN






Today: 21.03.2023
Home Peer-reviewing procedure
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
  • Rating
  • Search
  • About Publisher
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Council
  • Regular journal reviewers
  • Information for Authors
  • Peer-reviewing procedure
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Place article
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.edu.ru
praxema.tspu.edu.ru
ling.tspu.edu.ru
npo.tspu.edu.ru
edujournal.tspu.edu.ru

Яндекс.Метрика
Journal on the history of ancient pedagogical culture
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -

Peer-reviewing procedure

CRITERIA OF MATERIAL SELECTION FOR PUBLICATION

The decision to publish a manuscript is made by the editorial office if there are two positive reviews from two external anonymous reviewers. Reviewers are appointed by the editorial office amongst the ones included in the list of reviewers of the journal on the proposal of the editorial council members or editorial board. Submitted manuscripts are considered on the basis of the following criteria:

  1. compliance of the manuscript content with the areas covered by the journal;
  2. compliance of the title of the manuscript with its content;
  3. originality and scientific novelty of the submitted study;
  4. adherence to citation rules;
  5. correctness of the bibliography formatting;
  6. adherence to the scientific writing style;
  7. compliance with the requirements of the journal for authors’ materials.

A submission which does not correspond, in the opinion of a reviewer, to at least one of the listed criteria will be declined for publication by this journal; in this case, the author receives a reasoned refusal from the editorial board.

© 2023 ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU