Representations of the lifeway in Soviet cinematography of the 1930s – early 1950s
DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2024-2-9-31
The article analyzes representations of the lifeway in Soviet films made in the period from the 1930s to the early 1950s (the Stalinist period of Soviet cinema). The idea of the certainty of the lifeway of Soviet people and the predetermined nature of their future is described. This trend is based on the sustainability and reproducibility of behavior patterns that can be transmitted through the arts. Soviet cinema can be considered as a source of behavioral models. The article analyzes what examples of living life were created in Soviet films of the Stalinist period and how this relates to the values of modern people. The research question is posed: What meanings and significance describe the representations of the “lifeway” presented in Stalinist cinema? Based on the review of literature, two tendencies stand out: biography glorification and biography typification. This, in the context of the tasks of the art of socialist realism, was necessary to create Soviet people’s behavioral models. For an empirical analysis, a technique is used that is based on the ideas of the structural-semiotic approach. Based on psychological approaches to understanding of the lifeway, the main units of film analysis are identified: life events and time perspective (attitude to the past, present, future). The films were selected according to the criterion of correspondence of the central theme to the description of the Soviet people’s life events presented within the framework of the film over a certain period. Initially, a general analysis of films about Soviet people’s “lifeway” was carried out, and then, with the help of a case study, the film The Village Teacher (year 1947) was considered in more details. The representations of the lifeway are analyzed on the basis of the events’ content and distribution by life spheres. The following life themes are highlighted: (1) the character’s labor formation is shown as the focus of the most significant meanings of his life; (2) the theme of love is closely related to work activities; love is the “reward” of characters who are successful at work; (3) the collective is shown as a significant context of human life. The character’s internal qualities include willpower, persistence, and unity of purpose. Choosing a difficult path is also associated with heroism. Orientation towards the future, idealistic plots, and lack of information about the character’s past characterize the time perspective of Soviet films. Based on the case study, the cyclical dynamics of the “lifeway” is described as a way of “controlling the collective future” and as an optimistic confidence in it. The results are discussed in the context of the stability and reproducibility of certain values presented in Soviet films in modern people’s behavioral patterns. It is concluded that the attractiveness of perceiving life as stable is determined by a sense of comprehensibility of the structure of the world, certainty of the future, and confidence in the tomorrow.
Keywords: semiotics of cinema, hero, life event, time perspective
References:
Balina, M. (2000). Diskurs vremeni v sotsrealizme [Discourse of time in socialist realism]. In H. Günther, & E. Dobrenko (Eds.), Sotsrealisticheskii kanon. Sbornik statei [Socialist realist canon. Collection of articles] (pp. 585–595). Akademicheskiy proekt.
Bityutskaya, E. V., & Khanaliyeva, N. N. (2022). Features of coping with situations of change among representatives of Azerbaijani culture. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Psikhologiya. Sotsiologiya. Pedagogika – Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Psychology. Sociology. Pedagogy, 12(4), 487–506. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2022.407
Bityutskaya, E. V., Kheruvimova, A. A., Mirzamedova, T. I., Skvortsova, A. K., & Spitsyna, A. A. (2020). Osobennosti vosprinimaemoy zhiznennoy situatsii v period pandemii [Peculiarities of the perceived life situation during the pandemic]. In A. L. Zhuravlev, M. A. Kholodnaya, & P. A. Sabadosh (Eds.), Abilities and mental resources of a person in the world of global changes (pp. 1043–1050). Institute of Psychology, RAS.
Clark, K. (2002). The Soviet Novel: History as ritual. Ural State University. (In Russian).
Dashkova, T. (2004). Lyubov’ i byt v sovetskom kinematografe 30–50-kh godov [Love and life in Soviet cinema 30-50-ies]. In S. S. Sekirinskogo (Ed.), Istoriya strany. Istoriya kino [History of the country. History of cinema] (pp. 218–234). Znak.
Dashkova, T. (2008). Granitsy privatnogo v sovetskikh kinofil’makh do i posle 1956 goda: problematizatsiya perekhodnogo perioda [The boundaries of the private in Soviet films before and after 1956: problematization of the transition period]. In N. Borisova, K. Bogdanov, & Yu. Murashov (Eds.), SSSR: Territoriya lyubvi. Sbornik statei [USSR: Territory of love. Collection of articles] (pp. 146–169). Novoe izdatel’stvo.
Dobrenko, E. (2000). Sotsrealizm i mir detstva [Social realism and the world of childhood]. In H. Günther, & E. Dobrenko (Eds.), Sotsrealisticheskii kanon. Sbornik statei – Socialist realist canon. Collection of articles (pp. 31–40). Akademicheskii proekt.
Dobrenko, E. (2008). Muzei revolyutsii: sovetskoe kino i stalinskiy istoricheskiy narrativ [Museum of the Revolution: Soviet Cinema and Stalin’s Historical Narrative]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie.
Druzhinin, A. S. (2022). Cinematic observation in linguistics and beyond: towards an empirical science. ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Problemy vizual’noy semiotiki – ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics, 2 (32), 9–29. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.23951/2312-7899-2022-2-9-29
Dubin, B. V. (2001). Slovo – pis’mo – literatura: Ocherki po sotsiologii sovremennoi kul’tury [Word – letter – literature: Essays on the sociology of modern culture]. NLO.
Grishina, N. V. (2011). Life scripts: normativity and individualization. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya: elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal – Psychological research: electronic scientific journal, 3(17). (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v4i17.846
Gudkov, L. (2005). Ideologema vraga. “Vragi” kak massovyi sindrom i mekhanizm sotsiokul’turnoi integratsii [The ideologeme of the enemy. “Enemies” as a mass syndrome and the mechanism of socio-cultural integration]. In N. Konradova (Ed.), Gudkov L. Obraz vraga [Image of the enemy] (pp. 7–79). OGI.
Günther, H. (2000). Totalitarnoe gosudarstvo kak sintez iskusstv [The totalitarian state as a synthesis of the arts]. In H. Günther, & E. Dobrenko (Eds.), Sotsrealisticheskii kanon. Sbornik statei [Socialist realist canon. Collection of articles] (pp. 7–15). Akademicheskiy proekt.
Günther, H. (2000). Arkhetipy sovetskoy kul’tury [Archetypes of Soviet culture]. In H. Günther, & E. Dobrenko (Eds.), Sotsrealisticheskii kanon. Sbornik statei [Socialist realist canon. Collection of articles] (pp. 743–784). Akademicheskiy proekt.
Khazova, S. A. (2014). Mental’nye resursy sub”ekta: priroda, funktsii, dinamika [Mental resources of the subject: nature, functions, dynamics]. Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. N.A. Nekrasova. Pedagogika. Psikhologiya. Sotsial’naya rabota. Yuvenologiya. Sotsiokinetika, 20(4), 47–53.
Klassika sovetskogo kino (ofitsial’nyy kanal). (2023, February 4). Sel’skaya uchitel’nitsa [Rural teacher]. [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oI3DfdDfUAs
Levada, Yu. A. (Ed.). (1993). (1993). Sovetskiy prostoy chelovek: opyt sotsial’nogo portreta na rubezhe 90-kh [The Soviet simple man: the experience of a social portrait at the turn of the 90s]. “Mirovoi okean”.
Levin, K. (2001). Dinamicheskaya psikhologiya: Izbrannye trudy [Dynamic psychology: Selected works]. Smysl.
Liderman, Yu. G. (2004). Motivy “proverki” i “ispytaniya” v postsovetskoi kul’ture: na materiale kinematografa 1990-kh godov [Motifs of “verification” and “testing” in post-Soviet culture: on the material of cinema of the 1990s]. Culturology Cand. Diss. Moscow.
Lotman, Yu. M. (1973). Semiotika kino i problemy kinoestetiki [Semiotics of cinema and problems of cinema aesthetics]. Izdatel’stvo “Eesti Raamat”.
Lotman, Yu. M. (1998). Ob iskusstve [The structure of a literary text] (pp. 14–285). Iskusstvo SPb.
Margolit, E. Ya. (1988). Sovetskoe kinoiskusstvo. Osnovnye etapy stanovleniya i razvitiya: Uchebnoe posobie. [Soviet cinema. The main stages of formation and development: Textbook]. VZNUI.
Nurkova, V. V. (2018). Ot khaosa povsednevnogo opyta k istorii zhizni: sotsiokul’turnoe formatirovanie avtobiograficheskogo samosoznaniya [From the chaos of everyday experience to the history of life: sociocultural formatting of autobiographical self-awareness]. Issledovatel’ – Researcher, 3-4, 10–24.
Petrova, A. P. (2021). Kul’turnyy geroy i ekrannyy geroy: sushchnostnye kharakteristiki obraza [Cultural hero and screen hero: essential characteristics of the image]. Khudozhestvennaya kul’tura – Artistic Culture, 1(36), 244–264.
Rubinshtein, S. L. (2003). Bytie i soznanie. Chelovek i mir [Being and consciousness. Man and the world]. Piter.
Rubinshtein, S. L. (2015). Osnovy obshchey psikhologii [Fundamentals of general psychology]. Piter.
Sennikova, V. V., & Savelyeva, E. N. (2017). The Character Image of Russian and Soviet Cinema: From Socialist Realism Model to Uncertainty of Post-soviet Period. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Kul’turologiya i iskusstvovedenie – Tomsk State University Journal of Cultural Studies and Art History, 27, 251–262. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17223/22220836/27/23
Sogomonov, A. Yu. (2012). Sotsiologiya neochevidnogo: kul’turnyi vybor i aporii “vysokoi” sovremennosti [Sociology of the non-obvious: cultural choice and aporias of “high” modernity]. OOO “Variant”.
Volger, Ch., & McKenna, D. (2018). Memo From the Story Department. Al’pina non-fikshn. (In Russian).
Zainetdinova, R. A. (2010). Predposylki formirovaniya strukturno-semioticheskoy kontseptsii Yu. Lotmana [The prerequisites of formation of Yuri Lotman’s structural-semiotical conception]. Diskurs-Pi, 1-2, 213–218.
( 643.07 kB ) 
( 625.54 kB )
Issue: 2, 2024
Series of issue: Issue 2
Rubric: ARTICLES
Pages: 9 — 31
Downloads: 254