SYSTEMATIZATION OF THE IMAGES OF ANIMAL WELFARE ACTIVISTS’ GOALS
DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2018-4-103-124
Each cultural period has its own style which represents the main idea and purposes expressed by visual and discourse forms. Thus, it is possible to see how the created symbolism imprints the understanding of a period, “positive” and “negative”, the benefits and right trajectories for life. The paper addresses to bioethics as a cross-disciplinary system which was made to protect and respect life, its identity and autonomy. Thus, changes in symbolism can also reflect the purposes of bioethics for a projection of possible options of the future. We can see how verbal symbolism of bioethics works for the growth of requirements which answer the ideas of social altruism. In the recent decades, not only quantitative, but also high-quality growth of charity foundations, organizations, volunteer associations and societies of help in various spheres (health care, ecology, law, sport, culture, etc.) is observed in Russia and around the world. In this paper, a question is raised about the sphere of protection and help for animals. Versions and areas of work of animal protection movements are considered. The analysis of visual expression, motives, coloristic and symbolical visual expression of the organizations is carried out. Conclusions are drawn on the character and the concept of this activity. The main directions of modern concepts of animal protection are animal welfare, that is control of psychological and physical well-being of animals, and animal rights, whose supporters promote the inadmissibility of separate kinds of traditional use of animals by the person in the economic activity. As a result, several directions of animal protection directly or indirectly connected with the main problems are formed: exploitation of animals, use of animals, control over animals, welfare of animals, rights of animals. In practice, work with problems concerning animals is developing so that there are organizations, volunteer movements, charity foundations, initiative groups working in the following directions: organization of promotion, events, actions for informing and changing the society’s ideas concerning animals, for developing a humane attitude (animal welfare) to them; theoretical, legal work on protection and release of animals (animal rights); work on rescue of animals: endangered species, pets or animals injured in accidents, in the wild nature (animal rescue); organization of animal shelters, support funds, natural parks, work on rehabilitation of animals, return to the habitat (adoption, shelters, rehab). There is also a specialization in animal species: pets or partners (cats, dogs, etc.), farm animals (cows, sheep, etc.), trade types (fur industry of etc.), animals in experiments (mice, rabbits, monkeys, etc.), wild animals (animals from woods, sea fauna, etc.), rare and endangered species (pandas, tigers, etc.). Thus, “animal activists” are the general concept which unites various categories of people who can initially have various understandings of the good, but are united by the purpose of protecting animals from excessive suffering. The concept “animal welfare” is quite a broad concept based on an ethical position of animal activists who are convinced that each animal has advantages, and each animal must be respected and protected. Investigating symbolism and visual designations of animal protection and areas of organizations’ activities, it is possible to allocate some groups, features and subjects. The organizations’ work with different species of animals (pets, animals as partners, farm animals, wild animals, marine animals, etc.) can also be reflected visually. The color scale is quite diverse: it is either all colors of the rainbow, or one or two primary colors (black and white, blue, green, red and their shades, orange and yellow). As a general conclusion, it is possible to speak about the visuality of volunteering. It expresses the spirit, the main directions and concepts of work of volunteer organizations of animal protection: care, assistance, responsibility, humanity, protection, mercy, respect for all living beings. Animal activists work to minimize the infliction of harm to the surrounding nature and animals which people uses or which depend on them, and, whenever possible, they pursue benefit and advantage for the nature.
Keywords: animal welfare, volunteers, images, symbols, visuality, bioethics
References:
Argamakova, A.A. (2018) The paradoxes of scientific ethos. Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki – Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 55(2). pp. 36–34. (In Russian). DOI: 10.5840/eps201855224
Afonasin, E.V. (2016) Aristotle on the movement of animals. Schole. Filosofskoe antikovedenie i klassicheskaya traditsiya – ΣXOLH. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition. 10(2). pp. 733–753. (In Russian). DOI: 10.21267/AQUILO.2016.10.2971
Voevodin, N.M. & Lisanyuk, E.N. (2018) Argumentation in the wake of euthanasia. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 42. pp. 25–42. (In Russian). DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/42/3
Gorbuleva, M.S. (2015) Volunteering: genesis and motives. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 5(158). pp. 140–146. (In Russian).
Gorbuleva, M.S. (2016) [eduction of correlation between symbolization of volunteering goals and bioethics goals]. Nauka i obrazovanie [Science and Education]. Proc. of the Twentieth International Conference. Tomsk, April 18–22, 2016. Tomsk: Tomsk State Pedagogical University. pp. 286–291. (In Russian).
Gorbuleva, M.S. (2017) Visual projections of ethical and law problems in the activity of Russian animal welfare. PRAXĒMA. Problemy vizual’noy semiotiki – ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics. 1(11). pp. 76–85. (In Russian). DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2017-1-76-85
Gorbuleva, M.S., Melik-Gaykazyan, I.V. & Melik-Gaykazyan, M.V. (2016) Why Russian animal protectors are as they are and why do they act as they dо? Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya – Sociological Studies. 4(384). pp. 157–158. (In Russian).
Zakutina, E.S. (2018) Pain: medical history and premises of sociological analysis. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 43. pp. 137–147. (In Russian). DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/43/13
Langer, S. (2000) Filosofiya v novom klyuche [Philosophy in a New Key]. Translated from English by S. Evtushenko. Moscow: Respublika.
Levin, S.M. (2018) Free will, science and causes of behavior. Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki – Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 55(2). pp. 153–164. (In Russian). DOI: 10.5840/eps201855235
Lisanyuk, E.N. (2016) Practical argumentation and ancient medicine. Schole. Filosofskoe antikovedenie i klassicheskaya traditsiya – ΣXOLH. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition. 10(1). pp. 227–259. (In Russian).
Maksimenko, L.A., Zenets, N.G. & Varova, N.L. (2018) Biological metaphysical scientism in addressing the issue of altruism and egoism. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 427. pp. 79–90. (In Russian). DOI: 10.17223/15617793/427/10
Melik-Gaykazyan, I.V. (2017) The ignoramus paradox: the time of visual symbolism domination. PRAXĒMA. Problemy vizual’noy semiotiki – ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics. 4(14). pp. 49–64. (In Russian). DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2017-4-49-64
Melik-Gaykazyan, I.V. & Meshcheryakova, T.V. (2015) The Hippocratic oath: the transformation of its semantics and the revival of its pragmatics. Schole. Filosofskoe antikovedenie i klassicheskaya traditsiya – ΣXOLH. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition. 9(1). pp. 35–44. (In Russian).
Meshcheryakova, T.V. (2015)Visualization in teaching bioethics: its forms and functions. PRAXĒMA. Problemy vizual’noy semiotiki – ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics. 1(3). pp. 127–132. (In Russian).
Pervushina, N.A. (2015a) The limits of applicability for visual information perception’s psychological theories. PRAXĒMA. Problemy vizual’noy semiotiki – ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics. 1(3). pp. 140–146. (In Russian).
Pervushina, N.A. (2015b) A bioethical element of the visualization. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 5(158). pp. 118–122. (In Russian).
Pervushina, N.A. (2017) Visualization of symbols euthanasia in modern mass media. PRAXĒMA. Problemy vizual’noy semiotiki – ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics. 1(11). pp. 66–75. (In Russian). DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2017-1-66-75
Cetalife. (2001) Printsipy blagosostoyaniya zhivotnykh. Vspomogatel’naya programma dlya prepodavaniya blagosostoyaniya zhivotnykh na veterinarnykh fakul’tetakh [Principles of Animal Welfare. Auxiliary program for teaching animal welfare at veterinary faculties]. Kharkiv: [s.n.].
Broom, D.M. (1991) Animal welfare: concepts and measurement. Journal of Animal Science. 69(10). pp. 4167–4175. DOI: 10.2527/1991.69104167x
Gorbuleva, M.S. (2017) Organizations in Russia: Analysis of Structure, Typology of Volunteering Base and Functional Problems. In: Soliman, K.S. (ed.) Vision 2020: Sustainable Economic development, Innovation Management, and Global Growth. Proc. of the 30th International Business Information Management Association Conference. [s.l.; s.n.]. pp. 3143–3148.
Gorbuleva, M.S. (2018) Volunteerism As Indicator Of Social, Economic And Emotional Wellbeing. The European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences. 35. pp. 403–410. DOI: 10.15405/epsbs.2018.02.47
Melik-Gaykazyan, I.V., Gorbuleva, M.S., Vengerovsky, A.I. & Melik-Gaykazyan, M.V. (2017) Semiotic diagnostics of social transformations. Education Excellence and Innovation Management through Vision 2020: From Regional Development Sustainability to Global Economic Growth. Proc. of the 29th International Business Information Management Association Conference. pp. 435–439.
Neumann, S.L. (2010) Animal Welfare Volunteers: Who Are They and Why Do They Do What They Do? Anthrozoös. 23(4). pp. 351–364. DOI: 10.2752/175303710X12750451259372
Pervushina, N.A. (2017) Semiotic Approach to Pedagogical Bioethics. In: Soliman, K.S. (ed.) Vision 2020: Sustainable Economic development, Innovation Management, and Global Growth. Proc. of the 30th International Business Information Management Association Conference. Madrid, November 8–9, 2017. [s.l., s.n.]. pp. 3232–3238.
Tarasenko, V.F., Melik-Gaykazyan, M.V., Gorbuleva, M.S. & Melik-Gaykazyan, I.V. (2016) “Rabbit effect”: the reasons of volunteer movements as the diagnostics of the role transformations of human resource management. Vision 2020: Innovation Management, Development Sustainability, and Competitive Economic Growth 28. Proc. of the 28th International Business Information Management Association Conference. Seville, November 9–10, 2016. [s.l., s.n.]. pp. 2179–2182.
( 2.88 MB ) 
( 2.77 MB )
Issue: 4, 2018
Series of issue: Issue 4
Rubric: ARTICLES
Pages: 103 — 124
Downloads: 1568