SPATIAL ICONS OF DEESIS AND ANGELIC LITURGY, IMAGE-PARADIGM OF HEAVENLY TEMPLE
DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2019-2-119-137
This article presents the research of features of hierotopy in apocalypses of medieval Russia. The concept of hierotopy was proposed by Alexei Lidov in 2002. This term means both a process of creation of sacred spaces (understood as a special kind of creativity) and a field of research, devoted to this process and related phenomena. Hierotopy initially was designed to study complex phenomena of iconography, temple architecture and religion. In order to describe previously obscure features and phenomena such terms as ‘spatial icons’ and ‘image-paradigms’ were designed. The term ‘spatial icon’ is understood as a dynamic sacred space created through religious ceremony, when a breathing environment of conducted ritual (with all its elements, participants and surroundings) is seen as a one complex spatial image. The most prominent examples of spatial icons are the ritual with Hoedegetria of Constantinople and medieval Russian ritual of “Donkey walk”. Imageparadigm is an initial sacred space ordered by God himself which is later recreated in other sacred spaces. We can see this phenomenon in attempts to recreate the image of the Holy Land in other places (like in the New Jerusalem monastery in Russia) or in a vision of byzantine temples seen as images of Heavenly Jerusalem. Later, hierotopical studies turned to investigate literature. However these studies rarely covered basic hierotopical phenomena such as image-paradigms and spatial icons. This article explores the image-paradigm of Heavenly Temple and two types of spatial icons. Image-paradigm of Heavenly Temple can be found in the Apocalypse of Abraham, Slavonic book of Enoch and in the Ascension of Isaiah. This image was initially designed in the First book of Enoch in which it echoes the structure of the Jerusalem Temple and the wilderness tabernacle, but also demonstrates its own specific characteristics which then are recreated in the images of Heavenly Temple in the apocalypses mentioned above. Spatial icons of deesis (“Descent of the Virgin into Hell”, “The apocalypse of Paul”) and heavenly liturgy (“The Ascension of Isaiah”, “Slavonic book of Enoch”) are different in their relation to Heavenly Temple. Angelic liturgy is always located in Heavenly Temple and is a remarkable part of this image. Deesis on the other hand isn’t linked to any particular location. They are also different in their relation to narrative as a whole and have a different function in its development. The expansion of deesis is consistent and gradual, deterministic in a turning of its stages. Development of this type of spatial icon sets up a culmination for a storyline and drives the plot itself (the wicked punished in hell receive mercy as a consequence of deesis’ development). Angelic liturgy, on the contrary, moves along a storyline, its culmination is more of a marker of a storyline’s culmination than the means of achieving it.
Keywords: hierotopy, spatial icon, image-paradigm, deesis, angelic liturgy, Heavenly Temple, medieval Russian apocalypses
References:
Barabanov 2009 – Barabanov N. D. The worship of the icon of the Virgin Hodegetria in Constantinople and Byzantine popular piety. Sea and shores. Moscow, 2009. P. 241–258. In Russian.
Bigun 2013 – Bigun O. A. Image-paradigm of a Christian temple in the works of Taras Shevchenko. Minsk, 2013. In Russian.
Blank 2009 – Blank K. Hierotopy in Dostoevsky and Tolstoy. Hierotopy. Comparative studies of sacred spaces. Moscow, 2009. P. 323–340. In Russian.
Bychkov 2013 – Bychkov D. M. Sacred topography in artistic picture of the world of the hagionovel by D. M. Balashov “Praise to Sergius” (hierotopic aspect). Vestnik of Astrakhan State Technical University. 2013. 2 (56). P. 91–98. In Russian.
Descent 1999 – Descent of the Virgin into Hell. Library of Ancient Russian literature. St. Petersburg, 1999. URL: http://lib.pushkinskijdom.ru/Default.aspx?tabid=4930 In Russian.
Enoch 1999 – The book of Enoch. Transl. into Russian. Library of Ancient Russian literature. St. Petersburg, 1999. URL: http://lib.pushkinskijdom.ru/Default.aspx?tabid=4921
Himmelfarb 2010 – Himmelfarb M. The Apocalypse: A Brief History. Oxford, 2010.
Hoffmann, Wolf 2009 – Hoffmann A., Wolf G. Narrative and iconic space – from Pontius to Pilate. New Jerusalems. Hierotopy and Iconography of Sacred Spaces. Moscow, 2009. P. 395–418.
Horujy 2011 – Horujy S. S. Plotin’s Light and the Light of Thabor: The Mystics of Light in Neo-Platonism and Hesychasm. Light and fire in the sacred space. Moscow, 2011. P. 37–44. In Russian.
Isaiah 1999 – Ascension of Isaiah. Transl. into Russian. Library of Ancient Russian literature. St. Petersburg, 1999. URL: http://lib.pushkinskijdom.ru/Default.aspx?tabid=5117
Lidov 2006 – Lidov A. M. Hierotopy. The creation of sacred space as a form of creativity and subject of cultural history. Hierotopy. Creation of Sacred Spaces in Byzantium and Medieval Russia. Moscow, 2006. P. 9–31. In Russian.
Lidov 2009 – Lidov A. M. Hierotopy. Spatial icons and image-paradigms in Byzantium culture. Moscow, 2009. In Russian.
Mlechko 2008 – Mlechko A. V. Hierotopy: the construction of sacred spaces in the novel by B. K. Zaytsev “House in Passy” (in the pages of “Modern Notes”). Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Literary. Criticism. Journalism. 2008. 7. P. 78–93.In Russian.
Nickelsburg, Van der Kam 2004 – Nickelsburg George W. E., Van der Kam James C. 1 Enoch: A New Translation.Minneapolis, 2004.
Okhotsimsky 2017 – Okhotsimsky A. D. (Andrew Simsky). Images-Paradigms in Hierotopy: Ontological and Functional Aspects. Diogenes’ lantern. 2017. 2. P. 355–372. In Russian.
Paul 1997 – The Apocalypse of Paul. Transl. into Russian. Ancient Russian apocrypha: texts and studies. Мoscow, 1997. URL: http://lit.lib.ru/img/i/irhin_w_j/biblioteka/apokrify.htm
Sazonova 2015 – Sazonova N. I. The “Donkey walk” in Russia in 16th – 17th centuries: content and semantic transformation. ΠΡΑΞΗΜΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics. 2015. 2 (4). P. 115–125. In Russian.
Smirnov 1888 – Smirnov A. V. The book of Enoch: critical-history study (Master’s thesis). Orthodox interlocutor. 1888. 9. P. 120–140. In Russian.
Tikhonravov 1863 – Tikhonravov N. S. The Apocalypse of Abraham. Records of Russian Apocrypha. Moscow, 1863. P. 32–78. In Russian.
Zagraevsky 2018 – Zagraevsky S. V. On scientific validity of hierotopy. ΠΡΑΞΗΜΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics. 2018. 1 (15). P. 49–69. In Russian.
( 380.12 kB ) 
( 369.44 kB )
Issue: 2, 2019
Series of issue: Issue 2
Rubric: ARTICLES
Pages: 119 — 137
Downloads: 1026