CONSTRUCTING A MYTHOLOGICAL PRE-CHRISTIAN WRITING SYSTEM: NEOPAGAN REPRESENTATIONS OF SLAVIC RUNES IN RUSSIAN TV AND FILMS
DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2019-3-225-253
It has been suggested that the modern “screen culture” is a substitute for reality, that it distorts the world around us. Perhaps these fears are somewhat exaggerated, as distorted perceptions of reality can be created by other forms of culture. However, the strong influence of cinema and television on the minds of viewers is quite obvious, so it is important to study the role of this industry in the creation of various modern myths. This article examines the process of formation in the minds of Russian viewers of the Slavic runes myth, which are depicted in films and TV programs as an ancient form of pre-Christian Slavic writing. This article shows that science knows nothing about the Slavs writing, similar to the runic writing. This fact allows us to assert that the idea of the existence of Slavic runes is a modern myth. Its genesis is connected with the appearance of pseudo-scientific historical literature in post-Soviet Russia and its influence on the formation of the literary genre of Slavic fantasy. For the first time this myth, which is very popular among Russian neopagans, hit the screens in 2004, when a four-part film series The Legend of Kashchei was released. The film was the first screen incarnation of this genre of Slavic fantasy. The viewer can see signs very similar to Scandinavian runes in the Slavic deities’ palace. Since that time, runes have become a popular feature of Russian mystical films and serials. Even if the runes do not intertwine directly with the Slavs, they are included in the context of Russian historical and cultural heritage. So viewers get used to associate the image of runic inscriptions with the pagan beliefs of ancient Russia. An even larger contribution to the formation of such representations has been made by TV programs, in particular, those shown on the channel REN TV. The existence of a highly developed Slavic runic written language is discussed as a fact in a number of such programs and fonts, stylized like the Scandinavian runes, are often used in the visual design of some of them. All this is fully in line with the ideas of Russian neo-pagans which, by the way, we can see in all these movies. But if recently it was possible to think that the Slavic runes are part of the marginal subculture of pseudohistory adherents and that it is impossible to see them in respectable media, now the situation has changed. In 2018, in Orthodox Easter, Channel One showed a docudrama The Baptism of Rus’. The subtitles of this film are stylized as runic inscriptions. Thus, despite the Orthodox-oriented nature of the film, it repeats the popular among Russian neo-pagans myth about Slavic runes, fixing it in the mass consciousness. Unfortunately, these ideas are not so harmless, as they contribute to the restoration of Nazi fabrications about the mystical symbolism of runes and the reception of these views by the Russian historical consciousness.
Keywords: modern mythology, runic writing, pseudohistory, neopaganism, Nazism, Russian historical consciousness, Russian TV, Russian cinema, screen culture
References:
Abasheva, Krinitsyna 2010 – Abasheva M. P., Krinitsyna O. P. Slavonic Fantasy: To the Problem of Genre Genesis. Herald of Chelyabinsk State Pedagogical University. 2010. 5. P. 202–207. In Russian.
Arkhipova 2018 - Arkhipova O. V. Digital Trends of Culture: Cultural Practice Transformation Experience. Saint-Petersburg Economic Journal. 2018. 1. P. 70–76. In Russian.
Arysheva 2017- Arysheva A. Cinematograph in Popular Culture: From Disseminating Popular Prints (Lubok) Toworking with Archetype and Myth. Theatre. Fine Arts. Cinema. Music. 2017. 2. P. 135–146. In Russian.
Beskov 2015 – Beskov A. A. Mythology of Mythology. Society. Environment. Development. (TERRA HUMANA). 2015. 1. P. 116–120.
Beskov 2016 – Beskov A. A. Reminiscences of Eastern-Slavic Paganism in Modern Russian Culture (Part Two). Colloquium heptaplomeres. 2016. Vol. III. P. 6–24.
Beskov 2017 – Beskov A. A. Reminiscences of Eastern-Slavic Paganism in Modern Russian Culture (Part Three). Colloquium heptaplomeres. 2017. Vol. IV. P. 7–19.
Druzhkin 2017 - Druzhkin Y. C. Screened – Approve. The Art and Science of Television. 2017. 13. 2. P. 34–57. In Russian.
Gamaleya 2017 - Gamaleya H. N. TV-communication as Compulsory Scenario of Continuous Imitation. The Art and Science of Television. 2017. 13. 4. P. 6–17. In Russian.
Goodrick-Clarke 2004 – Goodrick-Clarke Nicholas. The Occult Roots of Nazism: Secret Aryan Cults and their Influence on Nazi Ideology. London, 2004.
Gründer 2012 – Gründer R. Runengymnastik. Die soziale Konstruktion eines esoterischen Körper-Kultes. Körper, Sport und Religion. Ed. by R. Gugutzer, M. Böttcher. Wiesbaden, 2012. P. 341–356.
Ishchenko 2016 – Ishchenko E. N. “Visual Turn” in Contemporary Culture: Experience of Philosophical Reflection. Proceedings of the Voronezh State University. 2016. 2 (20). P. 16–27. In Russian.
Istrin 1988 – Istrin V. M. 1100 years of Slavonic Alphabet. Moscow, 1988. In Russian.
Jones 2018 – Jones Evelyn. Faith in the Æsir has been increasing in Sweden. Transl. from Swedish into Russian. InoSMI. 2018. March 9. URL: https://inosmi.ru/religion/20180309/241665303.html
Kozlov1996 – Kozlov V. P. Secrets of Falsification: A Handbook for Teachers and Students. Moscow, 1996. In Russian.
Kyzlasov 1994 – Kyzlasov I. L. Runic Scripts of Eurasian Steppes. Moscow, 1994. In Russian.
Lotman1962 – Lotman Yu. M. The Tale of Igor’s Campaign and Literary Tradition in the XVIII–Early XIX Centuries. The Tale of Igor’s Campaign – a Monument of 12th Century. Moscow, Leningrad, 1962. P. 330–405. In Russian.
Makaev 2002 – Makaev E. A. The Language of the Oldest Runic Inscriptions: A Linguistic & Historical Philological Analysis. Moscow, 2002. In Russian.
Malm 2018 – Malm S. Nazi scandal hits Norwegian Olympic team... MailOnline. 2018. January 31. URL: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5333849/Norwegian-Olympic-team-jumper-bears-Nazi-rune.html
Mees 2014 - Mees B. The etymology of rune. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur. 2014. 136. 4. P. 527–537.
Melnikova 2001 – Melnikova E. A. Scandinavian Runic Inscriptions. New Finds and Interpretations. Moscow, 2001. In Russian.
Melnikova 2014 – Melnikova E. A. “I remember you...”: Everyday Runic Writing in Scandinavia. Stratum plus. 2014. 5. P. 213–223. In Russian.
Petrenko 2017 – Petrenko Ye. S. Media Screens: in the Reality, in the Internet and Among the Actors of Civil Participation. The Art and Science of Television. 2017. 13. 3. P. 7–17. In Russian.
Shcherbak 1971 – Shcherbak A. M. On Runic Writing in South-Eastern Europe. Soviet Turcology. 1971. 4. P. 76–82. In Russian.
Telegin 2010 – Telegin S. M. Television as a Means of Creating Collective Myths. The Art and Science of Television. 2010. 7. P. 64–72. In Russian.
Tulchinsky 2017 – Tulchinsky G. L. Historical Consciousness and Screen Culture. The Art and Science of Television. 2017. 13. 1. P. 110–127. In Russian.
Voroshilova 2016 – Voroshilova M. B. Verbal Contextual Environment of the Nazi Symbols in Contemporary Extremist Discourse. Journal of Historical, Philological and Cultural Studies. 2016. 3 (53). P. 150–157. In Russian.
( 3.49 MB ) 
( 3.47 MB )
Issue: 3, 2019
Series of issue: Issue 3
Rubric: ARTICLES
Pages: 225 — 253
Downloads: 6474