THE ROLE OF TRADING ZONES IN FORMING AN INTEGRATED WORLD-PICTURE
DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2019-4-110-125
The article aims to analyze the evolution of an integrated world-picture in the empirical subject’s mind within trading zones. The author proposes and briefly describes a typology of trading zones, including Galisonian (collaborations within and between scientific communities), Humboldtian (interactions in education), and non-Humboldtian (interactions between scientists and society). He assumes that, under certain conditions, Humboldtian and non-Humboldtian trading zones can proceed by using everyday language rather than scientific one. The translation of a scientific phenomenon’s depiction into laypeople’s language is illustrated with an example of using visual representations. The author relies on Peter Galison’s concept of trading zones, as well as on a few approaches to visual representations in science (by Russian scholars F.M. Zemlianskiy, A.I. Nikonov, and V.P. Branskiy). By elucidating the specifics of trading zones, the author discusses major conditions for the evolution of an integrated world-picture in the subject’s mind. It is shown that, nowadays, such an evolution can be possible only with rather significant approximations. Based on a peculiar artifact within a Humboldtian trading zone, the author considers an evolution of an integrated world-picture, viewing this process as largely similar to the growth of knowledge in the hypothetico-deductive model. He concludes that an integrated world-picture in a Humboldtian trading zone emerges in the mind of a tutor (transmitting information) rather than a student (receiving information), and that a similar situation can occur in non-Humboldtian trading zones. The article also provides arguments on why, despite the many difficulties, non-Humboldtian trading zones are needed, and suggests the necessity of a mediator in them. The author substantiates an idea that it is the philosopher that is most beneficial in such mediation.
Keywords: trading zone, Galisonian trading zone, Humboldtian trading zone, non-Humboldtian trading zone, integrated world-picture, visual representations
References:
Abramov, R.N. & Kozhanov, A.A. (2015) Popular Science Conceptual Analysis: Models of Science, Society and Media Communications. Sotsiologiya nauki i tekhnologiy – Sociology of Science and Technology. 6(2). pp. 45–59. (In Russian).
Abrarova, Z.F. (2010) Vizualizirovannyy obraz v nauchnom poznanii [Visualized Image in Scientific Knowledge]. Abstract of Philosophy Cand. Diss. Ufa: Bashkir State University.
Branskiy, V.P. (2010) Filosofskoe znachenie “problemy naglyadnosti” v sovremennoy nauke [The philosophical significance of “visuality problem” in modern science]. Moscow: Librokom.
Chudinov, E.M. (1986) Problema ratsional’nosti nauki i stroitel’nye lesa nauchnoy teorii [The Problem of Rationality of Science and Frames of Scientific Theory]. In: Gott, V.S. (ed.) Priroda nauchnogo otkrytiya [The Nature of Scientific Discovery]. Moscow: Nauka, pp. 115–130.
Collins, H. & Evans, R. (2007) Rethinking Expertise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dorozhkin, A.M. (2017) Design and typology problems of trading zones. Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki – Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 54(4). pp. 20–30. (In Russian). DOI: 10.5840/eps201754462
Dorozhkin, A.M. (2018) Philosopher as a mediator. The Digital Scholar: laboratoriya filosofa – The Digital Scholar: Philosopher’s Lab. 1(2). pp. 6–23. (In Russian). DOI: 10.5840/dspl20181213
Dorozhkin, A.M. & Shibarshina, S.V (2017) The Hypothetico-Deductive Method of Scientific Inquiry: Field of Use and Basic Interpretation. Vestnik Vyatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Herald of Vyatka State University. 2. pp. 11–18. (In Russian).
Einstein, A. (1967) Sobranie nauchnykh trudov [Collection of Scientific Works]. Translated from German by N.N. Andreev. Vol. 4. Moscow: Nauka.
Fizikabook.ru. (n.d.) Dyrochnaya provodimost’ [hole conductivity]. [Online] Available from: http://fizikabook.ru/articles/dyrochnaya-provodimost.html (Accessed: 21.02.2019).
Fuller, S. (2009) The Sociology of Intellectual Life: The Career of the Mind in and Around the Academy. London: SAGE Publications.
Galison, P. (1999) Trading Zone. Coordinating Action and Belief. In: Biagioli, M. (ed.) The Science Studies Reader. N.Y.; London: Routledge. pp. 137–160.
Gorman, M., Swami, N. & Werhane, P.H. (2009) Moral Imagination, Trading Zones, and the Role of the Ethicist in Nanotechnology. NanoEthics. 3(3). pp. 185–195. DOI 10.1007/s11569-009-0069-8
Jordi, C. (2017) The Unity of Science. In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. [Online] Available from: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-unity/ (Accessed: 17.02.2019).
Kasavin I.T. (1998) Migratsiya. Kreativnost’. Tekst: Problemy neklassicheskoy teorii poznaniya [Migration. Creativity. Text: Problems of the Non-Classical Theory of Knowledge]. Moscow: Russian Christian Humanitarian Institute.
Kasavin, I.T. (2017) Trading zones as a subject-matter of social philosophy of science. Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki – Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 51(1). pp. 8–17. (In Russian). DOI: 10.5840/eps20175111
Lektorskiy, V.A. (2018a) Chelovek i kul’tura. Izbrannye stat’i [Man and Culture. Selected Articles]. St. Petersburg: Saint Petersburg University of the Humanities and Social Sciences. pp. 340–351.
Lektorskiy, V.A. (2018b) Chelovek i kul’tura. Izbrannye stat’i [Man and Culture. Selected Articles]. St. Petersburg: Saint Petersburg University of the Humanities and Social Sciences. pp. 331–340.
Lozzi, M. (1970) Istoriya fiziki [The History of Physics]. Translated from Italian by E.L. Burshteyn. Moscow: Mir.
Porus V.N. (2010) On the Bridge of Interpretations: R. Merton and Social Epistemology. Sotsiologiya nauki i tekhnologiy – Sociology of Science and Technology. 1(4). pp. 104–118. (In Russian).
Rakhmatullin, R.Yu. (2016) Visualizations in Scientific Worldview. Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul’turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 12(3). pp. 141–143. (In Russian).
Rosbach, D. (2012) Building a Transdisciplinary Trading Zone. The International Journal of Science in Society. 3(3). pp. 17–30.
Stepin, V.S. (2006) Filosofiya nauki. Obshchie problemy [Philosophy of Science. General Problems]. Moscow: Gardariki.
Winther, R.G. (2015) Evo-Devo as a Trading Zone. In: Love, A.C. (ed.) Conceptual Change in Biology, Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science. Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. pp. 459–482. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-9412-1_21
Zemlyanskiy, F.M. & Nikonov, A.I. (2010) Kartina mira v protsesse stanovleniya individual’no-lichnostnogo mirovozzreniya [The picture of the world in the formation of an individual personal worldview]. Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya “Sotsial’no-gumanitarnye nauki” – Bulletin of South Ural State University, Series Humanities and Social Sciences. 8(184):14. pp. 121–123.
( 340.89 kB ) 
( 321.56 kB )
Issue: 4, 2019
Series of issue: Issue 4
Rubric: ARTICLES
Pages: 110 — 125
Downloads: 1057