GAME DESIGN AND THE ONTOLOGY OF THE IMPOSSIBLE
DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2022-3-39-52
In modern philosophy, the topic of “ontological turn” and “impossible reality” is relevant. The author considers this situation in a semiotic way. The object of the research is the search for a symbolic environment representing the “Impossible”. The author analyzes the specifics of the presentative language (non-discursive sign systems) and specifically digital imagery. The assumption is substantiated that the desired symbolic mediation with the “Impossible” can be found in this area. The author makes an assumption about the pragmatic effect of this communicative situation. This effect is associated with the possibility of an ontological “update”: the formation of new conditions for the intelligibility of experience. Further, the author discusses the heuristic potential of computer games as a model situation of contact with the “Impossible”. Based on the analysis of 4D Toys and Miegakure, the author proposes a sketch of the ontology of 4D-spatiality. She discusses the possibility of an “open ontology" and the heuristic potential of "building up" transcendental possibilities. At the same time, the author questions the previous understanding of “peculiarity” and “selectivity” in the knowledge of the “beyond”: the experience of a virtuoso gamer allows us to update the idea of our abilities to overcome the boundaries of reality (for a gamer, the physics of a particular game world). This refutes the myth of the “perfect game”, just as glitch art refutes the myth of the “perfect signal”. It is no longer possible to contrast “signal” and “noise”, “game” and “glitches”. Thus, the article draws attention to an important pragmatic aspect of digital images and, as a result, substantiates the possibility of convergence of theoretical philosophical positions and the practice of game design as projects implementing an “open ontology”.
Keywords: ontology, “Impossible”, computer game, four-dimensional space, virtuoso gamer, visual experience, weird effect
References:
Antichamber. (2013). Antichamber – illusory reality. Game Advisor. http://gameadvisor.ru/2013/02/18/antichamber-иллюзорная-реальность/ (In Russian).
Arnheim, R. (1974). Art and Visual Perception: A Psychology of the Creative Eye. Progress. (In Russian).
Gumbrecht, H.U. (2006). Production of Presence: What Meaning Cannot Convey. NLO. (In Russian).
Harman, G. (2019). On the Horror of Phenomenology: Lovecraft and Husserl. Logos, 29(5), 177–202. (In Russian).
Hoffman, D. D. (2009). The interface theory of Perception: Natural Selection Drives True Perception To Swift Extinction. In S. Dickinson, M. Tarr, A. Leonardis, & B. Schiele (Eds.), Object Categorization: Computer and Human Vision Perspectives (pp. 148–265). CUP.
Inishev, I. N. (2020). Distributed Imagery: Imaginative Practices of Contemporary Culture. Πraksema. Problemy vizual’noy semiotiki – ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics, 1(23), 31–46. (In Russian). DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2020-1-31-46
Kant, I. (1964). Dreams of a Spirit-Seer, Illustrated by Dreams of Metaphysics. Mysl’. (In Russian).
Land, N. (2020). Spirit and Teeth. Gile Press. (In Russian).
Langer, S. (2000). Philosophy in a New Key: A Study in the Symbolism of Reason, Rite, and Art. Respulika.
Meillassoux, Q. (2015). After Finitude: An Essay on the Necessity of Contingency. Kabinetnyy uchenyy. (In Russian).
Metzinger, T. (1997). The Ego Tunnel. Basic Books.
Miegakure. (2016). Designing a 4D World: The Technology behind Miegakure. [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZp0ETdD37E&t=0s
Murray, J. (1997). Hamlet on the Holodeck. The Future of Narrative in Cyberspace. The Free Press.
Regev, Y (2016). Impossible and coincidence: on the revolutionary situation in philosophy. Gile Press. (In Russian).
Smith, A. (2017). HyperRogue, the non-Euclidean roguelike, is a mind-melting masterpiece. https://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2017/09/28/hyperrogue-non-euclidean-roguelike/
Virilio, P. (2004). The vision machine. Nauka. (In Russian).
Zhagun-Linnik, E. (2017). The Understanding of Aesthetical Aspect in Glitch Art. Articult, 27(3), 144–150. (In Russian).
Zhukovsky, V. I., Pivovarov, D. V., & Rakhmatullin, R. Yu. (1988). Vizual’noe myshlenie v strukture nauchnogo poznaniya [Visual thinking in the structure of scientific knowledge]. Krasnoyarsk State University.
( 296.47 kB ) 
( 290.53 kB )
Issue: 3, 2022
Series of issue: Issue 3
Rubric: ARTICLES. ‘OPTICS’ FOR VISUAL DOMINANTS IN NEW PRACTICES OF THE VISUAL
Pages: 39 — 52
Downloads: 591