TERMINOLOGICAL PLANNING IN THE CONTEXT OF SMART EDUCATION: THE ROLE OF THE CONCEPT AS A WAY OF KNOWLEDGE VISUALIZATION
DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2022-4-28-62
The article deals with the problem of defining a term in the theories of terminological planning and the influence of the identified approaches on the organization of a student’s terminological work in the context of smart education. The aim of the article is to determine, in the context of smart education, the ways of a student’s terminological work depending on the interpretation of the term in the considered theories of terminological planning (General Theory of Terminology (GTT), Communication Theory of Terminology (CTT), Sociocognitive Theory of Terminology (STT), Frame-Based Terminology (FBT)). The article contains three sections: “Smart education: On the concept”, “Theories of terminological planning: The factor of the concept”, “The concept of the term, visualization and smart education”, expressing the authors’ sequence of consideration of the questions posed. The first section analyzes smart education as a concept. The latter is considered as a format of education whose key characteristic, according to the authors, is the maximum degree of the student’s independence in the development of knowledge and modern information technology. The knowledge acquisition system is interpreted through terminological work and terminology designation problems. The authors have established that the concept plays a key role in the definition of the term, since its status determines the status of the term. In the considered theories, there is no single way of understanding the concept and the term, and, consequently, the way of designating the term. The second section characterizes the main theories of terminological planning and features of term understanding and terminological work in them. In GTT, the concept is characterized as a specialized concept, in the context of which the meaning of the term is determined (according to the rule, one concept for one term). CTT uses the term “terminological unit”, which consists of three components: a unit of knowledge (concept), a unit of language (term), a unit of communication (situation). STT uses the concept “unit of understanding”, which can take the form of a category (repeated meanings of concepts) and the form of a concept (unique value). In FBT, the meaning of a term and concept is defined through a frame and its structure, represented by a conceptual component (nouns are used to express the static meanings of the term) and a predicative component (verbs are used to express the dynamic meanings of the term). The third section discusses the role of the concept “term” as a means of visualization, through which the student is able to understand the degree of comprehension of the term when learning. For smart education, it is important that, in the context of GTT, the student should only learn the special meanings of terms and does not take part in their formation; in the context of CTT, STT, FBT (differently in each), the student plays a decisive role in the formation of the meanings of concepts and terms. The key role in terminology designation is played by the mechanisms of visualization and conceptualization, presented as processes of a multi-level alternating change of the considered operations when working with concepts and terms towards greater abstraction of the latter.
Keywords: smart education, term, concept, meaning, terminological planning theories, visualization, conceptualization
References:
Ardashkin, I. B. (2003). Scientific problem in modern cognition process. In Proceedings of the 9th International Scientific and Practical Conference of Students, Post-graduates and Young Scientists – Modern Techniques and Technologies, MTT’ 2003 (pp. 260–262). Tomsk. 1438221.
Ardashkin, I. B. (2014). Values of modern education as a factor of development: Global trends and prospects of Russia. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal, 384, 60–67. (In Russian).
Ardashkin, I. B., & Netesova, M. V. (2019). Smart education as a new education paradigm: Pro et contra. In Sovremennye tekhnologii, ekonomika i obrazovanie [Modern technologies, economics and education] (pp. 103–104). Conference Proceedings. National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University.
Ardashkin, I. B., & Surovtsev, V. A. (2020). Smart education as a new education paradigm: pro et contra. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology, Political Science, 54, 51–61. https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863Х/54/5 (In Russian).
Ardashkin, I. B., Borovinskaya, D. N., & Surovtsev, V. A. (2021). The Epistemology of Smart Technologies: Is Smart Epistemology derived from Smart Education? Education & Pedagogy Journal, 1(1), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.23951/2782-2575-2021-1-21-35
Budin, G. (2001). A critical evaluation of the state-of-the-art of terminology theory. ITTF 6”>Journal, 12(1–2), 7–23.
Busse, D. (2012). Frame-Semantik: Ein Kompendium.De Gruyter.
Cabré Castellví, M. T. (2003). Theories of terminology. Their description, prescription and explanation. Terminology, 9(2), 163–199.
Faber Benítez, P. (2009). The cognitive shift in terminology and specialized translation. Monografías de Traducción e Interpretación, MonTI, 1. https://doi.org/10.6035/MonTI.2009.1.5
Faber, P. (2015). Frame as framework for terminology. In H. J. Kockaert, & F. Steurs (Eds.), Handbook of Terminology (vol. 1. pp. 14–33). John Benjamins.
Faber, P., & Cabezas-García, M. (2019). Specialized knowledge dynamics: From cognition to culture-bound terminology. Research in Language, 17(2), 197–211.
Felber, H. (1989). Terminology Manual. Infoterm.
Kerremans, K., Desmeytere, I., Temmerman, R., & Wille, P. (2005). Application-oriented terminography in financial forensics. Terminology, 11(1), 83–106.
Knyazeva, E. N. (2020). Visual images in the service of cognitive science. ΠΡΑΞΗΜΑ. Problemy vizual’noy semiotiki – ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics, 1(23), 58–75. https://doi.org/10.23951/2312-7899-2020-1-58-75 (In Russian).
Koshlakov, D. M., & Shvyrkov, A. I. (2020). Conception and Philosophy of Science. Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki – Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 57(2), 124–141. https://doi.org/10.5840/eps202057226 (In Russian).
Manerko, L. (2014). Concept understanding in cognitive linguistics and cognitive terminology science. In G. Budin, & V. Lušicky (Eds.), Languages for Special Purposes in a Multilingual, Transcultural World: Proceedings of the 19th European Symposium on Languages for Special Purposes, 8–10 July 2013, Vienna, Austria (pp. 471–483). University of Vienna.
Melik-Gaykazyan, I. V. (1997). Informatsionnye protsessy i real’nost’ [Information processes and reality]. Fizmatlit.
Melik-Gaykazyan, I. V. (2008). Modelirovanie obrazovatel’nykh sistem: issledovatel’skaya programma [Modeling of educational systems: Research program]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii – Higher Education in Russia, 9, 89–94.
Melik-Gaykazyan, I. V. (2014). Semiotics of education or “keys” and “lock picks” to the modelling of educational systems. Idei i idealy – Ideas and Ideals, 1:4 (22), 14–27. (In Russian).
Melik-Gaykazyan, I. V., Pervushina, N. A., & Smyshlyaeva, L. G. (2019). The research program of pedagogical bioethics in the conditions of uncertainty of social scenarios. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal, 448, 83–90. https://doi.org/10.17223/15617793/448/10 (In Russian).
Mironenko, E. S. (2018). Objectives and prospects of introducing smart-technology in the educational process. Sotsial’noe prostranstvo – Social Area, 1(13). https://doi.org/10.15838/sa/2018.1.13.5 (In Russian).
Picht, H. (2011). The Science of Terminology: History and Evolution. Terminologija, 18, 6–26.
Rashchupkina, A. S. (2016). Formation of the system of SMART education of the university as the newest type of education. In Tekhnologicheskaya perspektiva v ramkakh Evraziyskogo prostranstva: novye rynki i tochki ekonomicheskogo rosta [Technological perspective within the framework of the Eurasian space: new markets and points of economic growth]: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference, 20–22 October 2016 (pp. 378–383). Asterion. (In Russian).
Russian Federation. (2021, September 21). National Standard of the Russian Federation. Terminological policy. Development and implementation. http://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200104406 (In Russian).
Surzhanskaya, Yu. V. (2011). Kontsept kak filosofskoe ponyatie [Concept as a philosophical notion]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology, Political Science, 2(14), 70–78. (In Russian).
Temmerman, R. (2000). Towards New Ways of Terminology Description. John Benjamins.
Temmerman, R., & Kerremans, K. (2003). Termontography: ontology building and the sociocognitive approach to terminology description. Proceedings of CIL 17, 2003: Vol. 7, pp. 1–10. https://www.academia.edu/851013/Termontography_Ontology_building_and_the_sociocognitive_approach _to_terminology_description
Wuster, E. (1979). Introduction to the general theory of terminology and terminological lexicography. Springer.
( 416 kB ) 
( 395.31 kB )
Issue: 4, 2022
Series of issue: Issue 4
Rubric: ARTICLES
Pages: 28 — 62
Downloads: 337