A PERSON IN THE DIGITAL AGE
DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2022-4-102-122
In the context of economic, political, technological, cultural challenges and rapidly changing realities, one of the significant tasks of philosophy is to form a conceptual position about a person and, more broadly, to achieve a certain level of understanding of a person in a transforming world. Meanwhile, philosophers and specialists in the field of social and human sciences dealing with anthropological problems widely believe that all human projects have exhausted their resources. A radical variation of this opinion is expressed by the thesis “a person is dead”. The digital age, characterized by the intensification of the development of information electronic technologies and the introduction of the Internet into all spheres of society, is a fertile ground for the formation of a different, “posthuman” formation. The radical nature of these beliefs encourages the formation of a humanitarian alternative that takes into account modern technological trends and challenges of the time. The article consistently considers various aspects of the stated topic. The first section of the article discusses the digital human environment. The authors indicate a significant transition in the development of the Internet from anonymity to total control. The Internet has turned from a “magical” space (a pioneering technology) into an everyday means of political, economic and other practices. Communication now is subject to total economic and moral control. The second section, “A digital person: From transhumanism to Homo telematicus and beyond”, discusses a directly anthropological aspect. The position of a person is ensured by a frequently unconscious transfer of cognitive functions to the machine. A person predominantly seeks and copies information (consumer orientation), rather than produces it. Among modern practices of handling information, situational, one-time reproduction of text from the screen is popular. At the same time, the speed of access to content is conceived as an unconditional value. The authors give two options for interpreting the digital person, relying on the philosophical concept of Homo telematicus by Jean Baudrillard and on the discourse of transhumanism. The latter constructs images of a technologically transformed being that ultimately overcomes any “limitations” of human nature. The section “Digital Age: An individual in the space of publicity” examines the pattern catalyzed by the quarantine conditions of 2020. The public digital space has invaded the private environment. This trend has ambiguous consequences: on the one hand, the growth of the public sphere and the emergence of a wide range of political and professional roles narrow the private and actually make it a social mode; on the other hand, the private turns into the secret, which must be hidden, protected. The final section, “The time of the “significant-selves”: To the anthropology of the new world”, discusses the problem of personal identity in the digital age. The authors argue that the Internet at the present stage stimulates the activity of an individual and creativity. At the philosophical level, the authors conceptualized this phenomenon as the actualization of “self-significance”.
Keywords: digital age, digital technologies, digital humans, Internet, virtual, anthropological frontier, transhumanism, Homo telematicus, privacy, pandemic, identity, individuality
References:
Arendt, H. (2000). Vita activa, Or On the active life. Aleteyya. (In Russian).
Barthes, R. (2002). Roland Barthes about Roland Barthes. Ad Marginem; Stalker. (In Russian).
Baudrillard, J. (2000). The transparency of evil. Dobrosvet. (In Russian).
FM-2030. (2022, March 28). Are You a Transhuman? https://archive.org/details/areyoutranshuman00fm20
Gurevich, P. S. (2010). Kibernavt kak simvol global’nogo mira [Cybernaut as a symbol of the global world]. Vek globalizatsii, 2(6), 139–153.
Haq, M. N. (2022, March 28). Social Media Story: The Homo Digitalis Cultural Artifact. http://conference.ui.ac.id/isjai/isjai2019/schedConf/presentations
Heidegger, M. (1933). Time and being: Articles and speeches. Respublika. (In Russian).
Kemerov, V. E. (1996). Vvedenie v sotsial’nuyu filosofiyu [Introduction to social philosophy]. Aspekt Press.
Krongauz, M. A. (2020). Screenlife in the age of coronavirus lockdown. Kommunikativnye issledovaniya, 7(4), 735–744.
Kugay, A. I., & Mikhaylova, V. V. (2019). “Digital Generation”: Threats and Hopes in the Era of Information-Digital Civilization. Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie – Administrative Consulting, 7, 90–99. https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2019-7-90-99 (In Russian).
Kutyrev, V. A. (2010). Filosofiya transgumanizma [Philosophy of transhumanism]. Nizhny Novgorod State University.
Lachmann, B. (2017). Life-Satisfaction and Internet Addiction. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 14, 1176.
Lachmann, B., et al. (2018). Internet Communication Disorder and the Structure of the Human Brain: Initial Insights on WeChat Addiction. Science Republic, 8, 2155.
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1959). K kritike politicheskoy ekonomii [On the Critique of Political Economy]. In Sobranie sochineniy [Collected Works]. (vol. 13). Gosudarstvennoe izd-vo politicheskoy literatury. (In Russian).
Montag, C., & Diefenbach, S. (2018). Towards Homo Digitalis: Important Research Issues for Psychology and the Neurosciences at the Dawn of the Internet of Things and the Digital Society. Sustainability, 10(2), 1–21.
Petev, N. I. (2020). The new pandemic and its social and philosophical features (Based on world events in 2019–2020): The selfisolation/quarantine aspect and existential reflection. Vestnik VLGU. Seriya: Sotsial’nye i gumanitarnye nauki, 3(27), 95–109. (In Russian).
Prensky, M. (2011). Digital wisdom and homo sapiens digital. In Deconstructing Digital Natives. Young People, Technology, and the New Literacies (pp. 15–29). Routledge.
Smirnov, S. A. (2014). Anthropology nomadism. Anthropological trends and northern cultural code. Chelovek, 3, 5–17. (In Russian).
Sobirov, B. Sh. (2021). Homo Digital: Behavior in the Digital Age. Modern Science, 1-2, 112–116. (In Russian).
Trufanova, E. O. (2021). Escapism: between nature and culture. Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki – Vestnik of Northern (Arctic) Federal University. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences, 1, 125–134. (In Russian).
Trufanova, E. O. (2021). Private and public in the digital space: Blurring of the lines. Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies, 3(1), 14–38. (In Russian).
Velichkovskiy, B. M. (2017). Ot issledovaniy soznaniya k razrabotke kognitivnykh tekhnologiy [From consciousness research to the development of cognitive technologies]. In Sub”ektivnyy mir v kontekste vyzovov sovremennykh kognitivnykh nauk [Subjective world in the context of the challenges of modern cognitive sciences]. Akvilon.
Voyskunskiy, A. E., Evdokimenko, A. S., & Fedunina, N. Yu. (2013). S Network and real identity: a comparative study. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki – Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 10(2), 98–121. (In Russian).
( 368.86 kB ) 
( 354.67 kB )
Issue: 4, 2022
Series of issue: Issue 4
Rubric: ARTICLES
Pages: 102 — 122
Downloads: 530