THE GOLDEN RATIO IN ARCHITECTURE AS A SIGN OF CULTURAL ANTHROPOMORPHISM
DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2023-3-111-121
The sign structure of architectural proportions is investigated. The article aims to analyze the relationship between worldview attitudes and architectural proportions, and to show the dependence of the architectural image on the value and worldview attitudes. An art object determines the configuration of physical space, has the characteristics of a visual sign, and therefore is subject to semiotic interpretation in semantic, syntactic, and pragmatic aspects. Semiotic interpretations of a visual architectural sign are contrasted in semantic and pragmatic aspects. The latter are insufficient for the determination of a number of parameters of architectural forms. The article shows that the definition of a number of parameters of an architectural sign is associated with the ideality of the object of communication; the proportions of an architectural work were chosen in accordance with the proportions of an ideal human body (the Vitruvian Man by Leonardo da Vinci). The magical model of the universe became the basis for the planning scheme of ancient cities (the hierarchical organization of urban space serves as a metaphor for “city-space”). The result of the study is the opposition of the pragmatic and semiotic aspects of communication, expressed in the proportionality, form, and structure of architecture, while pragmatism is built on the functional reproduction of a simplified sample of the block structure, with the help of which the mass building of modern cities is carried out. “Praxeme” as a communicative sign, the presence of certain structures for translating the human message of non-human essence is fixed, that is, the practical actualization of linguistic meanings is rebuilt and obeys the conceivable subject and the mental image (praxeme of consciousness). Traditional architecture (primarily sacral) visually expresses a certain specific type of culture, representing itself through these forms and proportions. The “anti-humanity” of such buildings, the crushing sensations of the “stone jungle”, the general adverse effect on the psyche are noted. A conclusion is made about the opposition of the pragmatism and sacredness of architecture, expressed in the dispute “beauty versus function”. The need to find compromise solutions is indicated.
Keywords: golden ratio in architecture, anthropomorphism, architectural proportion as language
References:
Arnheim, R. (1974). Art and visual perception. Progress. (In Russian).
Avanesov, S. S. (2018). Gateway church in the structure of urban space: Semantics and typology. Balandinskie chteniya, XIII, 102–104. (In Russian).
Avanesov, S. S. (2022). Visual text of medieval Vladimir: The analysis of the dominant image of cathedral exteriors. Slovo.ru: baltiyskiy aktsent, 13(4), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.5922/2225-5346-2022-4-3 (In Russian).
Chubar’, P. I. (2015). Visual selection of urban space perception. ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Problemy vizual’noy semiotiki – ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics, 1(3), 56–59.
Coburn, A., Vartanian, O., & Chatterjee, A. (2017). Buildings, beauty, and the brain: a neuroscience of architectural experience. J. Cognit. Neurosci., 29 (9), 1521–1531.
Eco, U. (1998). The missing structure: Introduction to semiotics. TOO TK “Petropolis”.
Euclid. (1948–1950). Euclid’s elements. In 3 vols. GTTI. (In Russian).
Frege, G. (1977). On sense and denotation (1892). In A. I. Mikhaylov (Ed.), Semiotika i informatika: sb. statey [Semiotics and Informatics: Articles] (vol. 8, pp. 181–210). VINITI.
Gornova, G. V. (2019). Gorodskaya identichnost’: filosofsko-antropologicheskie osnovaniya [Urban identity: Philosophical and anthropological foundations]. Amfora.
Litvinenko, N. S., & Luchkova, V. I. (2015). Integration of the principles of systems of modules and proportions with information-spatial optimization of architectural objects. Novye idei novogo veka – 2015 [New ideas of the new century – 2015]. Proceedings of the International Conference (vol. 1, pp. 209–214). Pacific State University. (In Russian).
Lüttge, U., & Souza, G. M. (2019). The Golden Section and beauty in nature: The perfection of symmetryand the charm of asymmetry. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 146, 98–103.
Mahakul, D. J., & Agarwal, J. (2021). Pentagon Inside the Circle of Willis and the Golden Ratio. World Neurosurg, 156, 23–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2021.09.006
Makarova, M. Yu. (2019). Prakticheskoe rukovodstvo po rabote s sazhenyami [A practical guide to working with sazhens]. Kontseptual.
St-Jean, P., Clark, O. G., & Jemtrud, M. (2022). A review of the effects of architectural stimuli on human psychology and physiology. Building and Environment, 219, 109–182.
Voloshinov, A. V. (1992). Matematika i iskusstvo [Mathematics and art]. Prosveshchenie.
Wang, Y., Ke, Y., Wang, K., Guo, J., & Qin, F. (2022). A composition-oriented aesthetic view recommendation network supervised by the simplified golden ratio theory. Expert Systems with Applications, 195(7), Article 116500.
( 299.03 kB ) 
( 290.28 kB )
Issue: 3, 2023
Series of issue: Issue 3
Rubric: ARTICLES
Pages: 111 — 121
Downloads: 348