VISUAL STRUCTURE OF THE URBAN ENVIRONMENT AND THE CULTURAL CODE CONCEPT
DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2023-4-221-238
The article discusses the conditions for applying the concept “cultural code” in the field of urban studies. The visual structure of urban space is formed not only with the help of aesthetic and stylistic techniques, but also through the representation of the deep meanings of culture – values, images, normative attitudes, and moral standards. A code that allows the translation of information from the addresser to the addressee is used to convey any message in the field of communication. The specificity of the cultural code lies in the fact that it is an intermediary between the sign and the meaning rather than between the sign and the object. In fine arts, architecture, and urbanism, the same coding principle operates, according to which, at the level of presentation of a fact, a direct message is encrypted and transmitted (denotation), and, at the level of representation of meaning, subtext and context (connotation) are used. Culture is a semiotic environment, that is, a dynamic space for an exchange of signs and sign complexes. A sign in its connotative aspect always expresses some meaning. The cultural code is the order of expression of meanings, the norm of their communicative representation. According to the semiotic approach to analyzing urban space, the city is read as a visual text that directly communicates the functional configuration of the living environment and at the same time (at the level of connotation) refers to the values and traditions of a particular culture through various means of their visual representation.
Keywords: urban studies, semiotics, cultural code, city, visual environment, presentation, representation, cultural identity
References:
Akopyan, V. G. (2015). Interaction of Cultural Codes with Natural Language Code. Povolžskij pedagogičeskij vestnik, 2, 71–75. (In Russian).
Alexander, Ch., Ishikawa, S., & Silverstein, M. (2014). A Pattern Language. Towns. Buildings. Construction. Studiya Artemiya Lebedeva. (In Russian).
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva [Aesthetics of Verbal Creativity]. Iskusstvo.
Barthes, R. (1997). Semiology and the Urban. In N. Leach (Ed.), Rethinking Architecture (pp. 166–172). Routeledge.
Barthes, R. (2008). Le degré zéro de l’écriture. Editorial URSS. (In Russian).
Barthes, R. (2009). S/Z. Editorial URSS. (In Russian).
Eco, U. (2006). La struttura assente. Symposium. (In Russian).
Fedotova, N. G. (2022). The Cultural Code of the City. Slovo.ru: baltiyskiy aktsent,13(4), 10–24. (In Russian).
Gottdiener, M. (1983). Urban Semiotics. In J. Pipkin, M. La Gory, & J. R. Blau (Eds.), Remaking the City (pp. 101–114). State University of New York Press.
Izotova, N. N. (2020). Cultural Code: Semiotic Aspect. Culture and Civilization, 10(1 A), 122–127. (In Russian).
Krampen, M. (1979). Meaning in the Urban Environment. Routeledge.
Kuregyan, A. L. (2012). The Culture of Semiotics and Linguocultural Codes. Vestnik Vyatskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarnogo universiteta, 4(2), 79–81. (In Russian).
Lynch, K. (1960). The Image of the City. Routeledge.
Petrovskaya, Е. (2020). The Triune Environment Code and Modeling of Urban Tissue. Architecture and Modern Information Technologies, 3(52), 205–227. (In Russian).
Pomerantz, G. S. (2011). Code of Culture. Vestnik kul’turologii, 1(56), 149–152. (In Russian).
Rozenkova, Ch. E., & Shustova, S. V. (2017). Linguocultural Code: Definition, Problem of Classification, Role in Intercultural Communication. Evraziyskiy gumanitarnyy zhurnal, 2, 101–104. (In Russian).
Savchuk, V. (2022). Image Out of Place. Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies, 4(3), 35–46. (In Russian).
Savitsky, V.(2016). The Concept of Linguocultural Codes: A Rationale the Theoretical Substantiation of the Concept of Linguocultural Codes. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Lingvistika, 2, 55–62. (In Russian).
Issue: 4, 2023
Series of issue: Issue 4
Rubric: ARTICLES
Pages: 221 — 238
Downloads: 249