ARCHITECTURAL CONSTRUCTIVISM IN ODESSA: VISUAL-ANTHROPOLOGICAL RESEARCH
DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2023-4-167-189
The article analyzes the theoretical and methodological foundations of a visual-anthropological research on Soviet residential architecture in the constructivism style in Odessa. In the Soviet context, architecture played the role of a source of renewal. Constructivists consciously participated in the creation of the “new”, that is, modern man, ready to live in an era of global change and build a society of the future. This thesis is concretized by conducting a cultural-anthropological research in Odessa. Considerable attention is paid to the development and substantiation of a comprehensive methodological approach based on an anthropological perspective in the study of the city, a philosophical and anthropological understanding of culture as proportionate to a person, taking into account the diversity of forms of visual experience in modern culture, and based on the latest research in visual communication. The thesis is defended that with the help of the proposed methodology it is possible to discover new rather than predetermined meanings. One of the key conclusions is that the realized visual-anthropological research confirms the importance of the semiological approach to architecture. It allows exploring how architecture shapes human behavior, how the design of a new type of housing, to which both the authorities and architects paid special attention, participates in the creation of a new set of life connections. The constructivist house is studied as a specially organized space that conveys certain meanings. The results obtained make it possible to comprehend and reconstruct the “mechanisms” of cultural communication, ways of translating cultural meanings. The results of the study contribute to the reconstruction of the image of Odessa in the 1920s and 1930s, as well as to a deeper understanding of the anthropology of the socialist city.
Keywords: constructivism, house, cultural anthropology, visual semiotics, urban anthropology, visual anthropology, architectural anthropology, practice
References:
Avanesov, S. S. (2016). Visual semiotics of cities: perspective of urban texts studies. ΠΡΑΞΗΜΑ (Praxema). Journal of Visual Semiotics, 4(10), 9–22. (In Russian).
Avanesov, S. S. (2018). Urban space as anthropological phenomenon. ΠΡΑΞΗΜΑ (Praxema)․ Journal of Visual Semiotics, 2(16), 10–31. (In Russian).
Brednikova, O., & Zaporozhets, O. (Eds.). (2014). Mikrourbanizm. Gorod v detalyakh [Microurbanism. City in detail]. NLO.
Buchli, V. (2017). An Anthropology of Architecture. Gumanitarnyy tsentr. (In Russian).
Connerton, P. (1989). How Societies Remember. Cambridge University Press.
Doroshenko, A. (2016). Russian Art Nouveau in the City. Deribasovskaya – Rishel’evskaya. Al’manakh, 65, 50–76. (In Russian).
Dukhan, I. N., & Staruseva-Persheeva, A. D. (2022). Optical Strategies of New Media: from Perspectivism to Drifting Glance. ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ (Praxema). Journal of Visual Semiotics, 3(33), 9–38. (In Russian).
Eco, U. (1998). La struttura assente. Symposium. (In Russian).
Gadamer, H.-G. (1988). Wahrheit und Methode. Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik. Progress. (In Russian).
Geertz, C. (2020). After the Fact. Two Countries, Four Decades, One Anthropologist. NLO. (In Russian).
Grigorieva, N. (2009). Evolyutsiya filosofskoy antropologii v 1920–1950-kh gg.: radikalizatsiya obraza cheloveka [The evolution of philosophical anthropology in the 1920s – 1950s: the radicalization of the human image]. Abstract of Philosophy Dr. Diss. Moscow. (In Russian).
Hamby, J. (2022). Victorian Visions of Suburban Utopia: Abandoning Babylon, by Nathaniel Robert Walker. Science Fiction Studies, 49(3), 602–605.
Hatherley, O. (2019). Militant Modernism.Kuchkovo pole. (In Russian).
Khaydarova, G. (2015). From visual environment to visual anthropology. ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ (Praxema). Journal of Visual Semiotics, 4(6), 92–99. (In Russian).
Le Corbusier. (1977). Architecture of the 20th Сentury. Progress. (In Russian).
Mol, A. (2017). The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Gile Press. (In Russian).
Pallasmaa, J. (2013). The Thinking Hand: Existential and Embodied Wisdom in Architecture. Klassika-XXI. (In Russian).
Paperny, V. Z. (1996). Kul’tura Dva [Culture Two]. NLO.
Petrykivska, O. (2021). The Human Position in Urban Space. Philosophy and Cosmology, 27, 135–144.
Rezinko, D. B. (2002). Ideologicheskie praktiki v kontekste sovetskoy modernizatsii (sotsial’no-filosofskiy analiz) [Ideological practices in the context of Soviet modernization (socio-philosophical analysis)]. Philosophy Cand. Diss. Moscow.
Richardson,Т. (2008). Kaleidoscopic Odessa: History and Place in Contemporary Ukraine. University of Toronto Press.
Scott, J. С. (2005). Seeing Like a State. How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. Universitetskaya kniga. (In Russian).
Shlipchenko, S. (2008). Written in stone. Vsesvit. (In Ukrainian).
Smirnov, S. A. (2015). Phenomenon as a visual concept in anthropology of culture (from classical patterns to nonclassical experience). ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ (Praxema). Journal of Visual Semiotics, 1(3), 21–28. (In Russian).
Smirnov, S. A. (2021). Gorod i Chelovek: Ocherki po gorodskoy antropologii [City and Man: Essays on Urban Anthropology]. LENAND.
Smolenskaya, S. (2017). Architecture of Avant-garde Modernism in Ukraine: Genesis and Heritage. Architecture Dr. Diss. Kharkiv. (In Ukrainian).
( 1.55 MB ) 
( 1.54 MB )
Issue: 4, 2023
Series of issue: Issue 4
Rubric: ARTICLES
Pages: 167 — 189
Downloads: 195