The Russian political elite and power image constructing peculiarities in contemporary video games (on the Metro Exodus materials)
DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2024-2-57-78
This article studies the phenomenon of video games as instruments of constructing ideas about historical and political reality in the mass consciousness. In the modern world, video games became one of the most popular forms of entertainment along with other types of visual content – cinema, animation, online and print publications, etc. However, due to the specific technical tools, video games represent a fundamentally new means of constructing meanings because they create the effect of the player’s immersion and presence in a virtual reality. Such interactivity makes it possible for video games to be especially effective in broadcasting certain values and patterns of behavior to players, forming a specific socio-cultural reality around them. All the mentioned makes video games not only a kind of entertainment but a serious “soft power” tool for modern states. In the study, the authors make an attempt to find out the images and tools that allow modern video games form a certain reality in the mass consciousness. For this purpose, the authors use the case-study as a method of descriptive analysis, B. F. Skinner’s theory of operant conditioning, Tajfel and Turner’s social identity theory, and the method of expert interviewing. The authors resort not only to the theoretical understanding of the essence of video games based on foreign and domestic research in the sphere of game studies, but also to a practical analysis of the mechanisms used by the creators of video games to form a specific world view for gamers on the example of the Russian game Metro Exodus. The game action takes place in a post-apocalyptic world – an alternative Russia of the future, where people are forced to survive after a technogenic disaster. The game contains a lot of images of the Russian political elite, among which are a member of a secret service, controlling the media and oppressed population – the personification of the Russian government; a priest, deceiving his flock and connected with the criminal – the personification of the Russian Orthodox Church; the military and employees of the Ministry of Defence, literally “devouring” the population – the personification of militarism and the state of military structures in modern Russia; an oppressive southern autocrat, controlling the oil reserves and oppressing a local population – probably an allusion to the raw materials economy of Russia and related problems. The game’s creators use various visual problems, referring to the modern Russia, for instance, modified emblems with double-headed eagles, architecture which is typical to Russian cities, Russian military uniforms. The game plot is based on the victory of players over negative characters representing the Russian government– according to that, the authors of the article conclude that this video game forms similar patterns of behavior in the minds of players, whose ultimate goal is to overthrow the current state system in Russia. Along with that, the authors conclude that it is quite difficult now to evaluate the degree of emotional perception of these patterns among gamers. This will be possible only if an active protest movement in Russia arises.
Keywords: programming visualization, mass consciousness, political image, historical perceptions, entertainment
References:
Aarseth 1997 – Aarseth, E. J. (1997). Cybertext: Perspectives on Ergodic Literature. John Hopkins University Press.
Akbar, Kusumasari 2022 – Akbar, F., & Kusumasari, B. (2022). Making public policy fun: How political aspects and policy issues are found in video games. Policy Futures in Education, 20(5), 646–660.
Backe, Aarseth 2013 – Backe, H. J., & Aarseth, E. (2013). Ludic Zombies: An Examination of Zombeism in Games. Paper presented in DiGRA Conference, 7. http://www.digra.org/digital-library/publications/ludic-zombies-an-examination-of-zombieism-in-games
Belov 2018 – Belov, S. I. (2018). Computer games as a tool for implementing the policy of memory (on the example of displaying the events of the Great Patriotic War in video games). Bulletin of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series Political Science", 20(1), 96–104. (In Russian).
Belov 2020 – Belov, S. I. (2020). Computer games as a resource for implementing the policy of memory: practical experience and hidden opportunities (based on the materials of positioning the events of the Great Patriotic War). Bulletin of the Moscow Region State University. Series: History and Political Science], 1, 54–63. (In Russian).
Bogost 2005 – Bogost, I. (2005). Procedural literacy: Problem solving with programming, systems, and play. Journal of Media Literacy. 52(1 & 2), 32–36.
Bogost 2006 – Bogost, I. (2006). Unit operations. An approach to videogame criticism. The MIT Press.
Bogost 2010 – Bogost, I. (2010). Persuasive Games: The Expressive Power of Videogames. The MIT Press.
Bowman et al. 2022 – Bowman, N. D., Bowen, D. A., Mercado, M. C., Resignato, L. J., & de Villemor Chauveau, P. (2022). “I did it without hesitation. Am I the bad guy?”: Online conversations in response to controversial in-game violence. New Media & Society. 0(0).
Chapman 2012 – Chapman, A. (2012). Privileging Form over Content: Analysing Historical Videogames. Journal of Digital Humanities. 1:2, 42–46.
Chapman, Linderoth 2015 – Chapman, A., Linderoth, J. (2015). Exploring the Limits of Play: A Case Study of Representations of Nazism in Games. In T. E. Mortensen, & J. Linderoth (Eds.), Dark Play: Difficult Content in Playful Environments. Routledge.
Chasovsky 2012 – Chasovsky, P. N. (2012). Semiotics of “Easter eggs”, or the game principle in computer games. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University. Philology. Art history, 72(36), 63–66. (In Russian).
Eco 2016 – Eco, U. (2016). From maiden to labyrinth. Historical studies of sign and interpretation. Academic Project. (In Russian).
Eskelinen 2001 – Eskelinen, M. (2001). The Gaming Situation. Game Studies. 1(1). http://www.gamestudies.org/0101/eskelinen/
Fedorchenko et al. 2020 – Fedorchenko, S. N., Karlyavina, E. V., Tedikov, D. O., Markaryan, R. A., & Teslyuk, K. V. (2020). Some results of the Sociological Study “Computer Games and the Politics of Memory”. Journal of Political Research. 2, 90–105.
Fordham et al. 2020 – Fordham, J., Ratan, R., Huang, K. T., & Silva, K. (2020). Stereotype Threat in a Video Game Context and Its Influence on Perceptions of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM): Avatar-Induced Active Self-Concept as a Possible Mitigator. American Behavioral Scientist, 64(7), 900–926.
Grishin, Iglin 2015 – Grishin, O. E., & Iglin, D. A. (2015). Computer games as an element of mass political culture and communication. PolitBook, 1, 127–145. (In Russian).
Juul 2005 – Juul, J. (2005). Half-real. Video games between real rules and fictional worlds. The MIT Press.
Kempshall 2020 – Kempshall, C. (2020). Modern Warfare: Call of Duty, Battlefield, and the World Wars. In A. von Lünen, K. J. Lewis, B. Litherland, & P. Cullum (Eds.), Historia Ludens (pp. 255–266). Routledge.
Lopez Naranjo et al. 2024 – Lopez Naranjo, F., Maldonado, M. A., Cuadrado, E., & Moyano, M. (2024). Video Games Interventions to Reduce Radicalization and Violent Extremism in Young People: A Systematic Review. Games and Culture. 0(0).
Lotman 2022 – Lotman, Y. (2022). Inside thinking worlds. ABC, ABC-Atticus Publ. (In Russian).
Manovich 2018 – Manovich, L. (2018). The language of new media. Ad Marginem Press. (In Russian).
Melik-Gaykazyan 2022 – Melik-Gaykazyan, I. V. (2022). Semiotic diagnostics of splitting trajectories of dreams about the past and dreams about the future. Electronic scientific and educational journal “History”, 13(4). https://history.jes.su/s207987840021199-7-1/. (In Russian).
Metro Exodus 2019 – Metro Exodus. (2019). Developed – 4A Games. Publisher – Deep Silver. https://www.metrothegame.com/
Murray 1999 – Murray, J. H. (1999). Hamlet on the Holodeck. The Future of Narrative in Cyberspace. MIT Press.
Pérez-Latorre 2019 – Pérez-Latorre, Ó. (2019). Post-apocalyptic Games, Heroism and the Great Recession. Game Studies. 19 (3). http://gamestudies.org/1903/articles/perezlatorre
Pötzsch, Šisler 2016 – Pötzsch, H., & Šisler, V. (2016). Playing Cultural Memory: Framing History in Call of Duty: Black Ops and Czechoslovakia 38–89: Assassination. Games and Culture, 1-23.
Raessens 2010 – Raessens, J. (2010). Homo Ludens 2.0: The Ludic Turn in Media Theory (pp. 1–36). Universiteit Utrecht.
Ryan 2006 – Ryan, M. L. (2006). Avatars of Story. University of Minnesota Press.
Schulzke 2017 – Schulzke, M. (2017). Military videogames and the future of ideological warfare. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 19(3), 609–626.
Shevchenko 2023 – Shevchenko, I. A. (2023). Media rhetoric of historical video games in the life of Russian youth and the country’s national security. Studia Humanitatis, 2(9-9). https://st-hum.ru/content/shevchenko-ia-mediaritorika-istoricheskih-videoigr-v-zhizni-rossiyskoy-molodezhi-i (In Russian).
Sicart 2011 – Sicart, M. (2011). Against Procedurality. Game Studies, 11(3). http://gamestudies.org/1103/articles/sicart_ap
Skinner 1950 – Skinner, B. F. (1950). Are theories of learning necessary? Psychological Review, 4(57), 193–216.
Spokes 2020 – Spokes, M. (2020). The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Procedural Rhetoric and the Military-Entertainment Complex: Two Case Studies from the War on Terror. Media, War & Conflict. https://ray.yorksj.ac.uk/id/eprint/3670/3/MW&C%20Sub.pdf
Tajfel, Turner 2004 – Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2004). The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. In J. T. Jost, & J. Sidanius (Eds.), Political psychology: Key readings (pp. 276–293). Psychology Press.
Talanov 2023 – Talanov, S. L. (2023). Historical video games as a tool of politics. Social and Political Researches, 1(18), 20–38. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.20323/2658_428X_2023_1_18_20
Valeriano, Habel 2016 – Valeriano, B., & Habel, Ph. (2016). Who Are the Enemies? The Visual Framing of Enemies in Digital Games. International Studies Review, 18(3), 462–486.
Volodenkov 2020 – Volodenkov, S. V. (2020). Features of Technologies for Rewriting History in a Contemporary Digital Communications Space. History, 9(95). (In Russian).
Volodenkov, Fedorchenko 2015 – Volodenkov, S. V., & Fedorchenko, S. N. (2015). The Overton Window - a manipulative matrix of political management. Scientific-Analytical Journal Observer. 4(303), 83–93 (In Russian).
Wintle 2023 – Wintle, P. (2023). Mutants and Zombies Everywhere! Or Villains, Violence, and Selfishness: Questions of Humanity in the Post-apocalyptic (Pandemic) Video Game. Games and Culture. 0(0).
Zamaróczy 2017 – Zamaróczy, N. de. (2017). Are We What We Play? Global Politics in Historical Strategy Computer Games. International Studies Perspectives, 18(2), 155–174.
Žukauskas 2018 – Žukauskas, A. (2018). Video Games and the Politics of Historical Memory: War Memory in American and Russian Video Games. Politologija, 90(2), 88–113.
( 877.02 kB ) 
( 858.28 kB )
Issue: 2, 2024
Series of issue: Issue 2
Rubric: ARTICLES
Pages: 57 — 78
Downloads: 398