Cultural code of a modern regional city: An experience of discourse description (based on street art objects in Tomsk)
DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2024-3-117-137
Within the framework of the modern humanitarian paradigm, research carried out using interdisciplinary methodology is of particular relevance and is distinguished by the presence of a new perspective in the study of traditional objects. Involving semiotic and discursive analysis data in the consideration of objects of urban street art in order to identify their cultural potential determines the correspondence of the work to the modern vector of humanitarian thought development. Objects of regional street art culture are considered as means of transmitting socially significant values. Studying the functional potential of street art within the framework of various humanities allows us to understand the features of the national picture of the world in its regional version of synchronous existence and identify key aspects of culture and language that are reflected in street art. The aim of the article is to study art objects of the urban environment as a means of forming an idea of the system of collective axiological attitudes in relation to a particular city, existing in the minds of citizens and guests and constituting the essence of urban identity and cultural code. The material is individual street art objects that are part of the urban space of Tomsk – one of the Siberian cities with rich historical cultural traditions and at the same time sensitive to modern challenges and trends. The criteria for selecting objects for analysis were the recognition of an object in relation to its location in the urban space, the mandatory presence of a verbal component to express pragmatic and conceptual content, and the presence of the possibility of discovering cultural meanings in the process of interpretation. The methodological basis of the research is complex in the choice of tools and techniques. The main methods are discursive, linguo-conceptual and linguo-cultural analysis, supplemented by the results of introspective and experimental (using a social experiment in the format of an online survey) research. The analysis of each of the street art objects selected for presentation in the article is carried out in stages. Each stage is associated with a description of certain characteristics of the object: local, formal, substantive. In the latter case, special attention is paid to the analysis of the pragmatic, including axiological, semantics of the linguistic units included in the structure of the art object. As a result, a conclusion is drawn about the degree of significance of the art object for the representation of the cultural code of Tomsk. One of the objects was studied in terms of the manifestation of communicative and pragmatic properties in conditions of synchronous dynamics, taking into account changes in formal and content indicators. This study shows that street art elements in a regional landscape reflect the unique culture of a city, convey the lifestyle and behavioral norms of its inhabitants, reflect cultural traditions and mythology, as well as characteristics of collective thinking and linguistic expression.
Keywords: city discourse, urban text, cultural code of city, urban identity, regional city, street art, art object, discourse analysis
References:
Abdrashitova, M. O. (2015). Features of the representation of the image of Tomsk as a fragment of the subcultural picture of the world of a city dweller in modern folklore discourse. Vestnik nauki Sibiri ‒ Bulletin of Science of Siberia, 1 (16), 46‒54. (In Russian).
Emer, Yu. A. (2014). The image of the city in song folklore. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya ‒ Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Philology, 6 (32), 77‒86. (In Russian).
Guzhova, I. V. (2014). Visualization of the cultural code of the city in image communication using new media technologies (semiotic approach). Istoricheskiye, filosofskiye, politicheskiye i yuridicheskiye nauki, kul’turologiya i iskusstvovedeniye. Voprosy teorii i praktiki ‒ Historical, Philosophical, Political and Legal Sciences, Cultural Studies and Art History. Questions of Theory and Practice, 2-2(40), 45‒49. (In Russian).
Kiselev, V. S. (2017). Tomsk in Russian literature: problems and prospects for studying. Imagologiya i komparativistika ‒ Imagology and Comparative Studies, 8, 36–61. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17223/24099554/8/3
Korchagina, E. Yu. (2021). Culture and language as the basis of national identity, the archetypal code of wooden carvings of Tomsk platbands. Yazyk i kul’tura [Language and culture]. Conference Proceedings. TSU. (рр. 65‒73). (In Russian).
Krasnykh, V. V. (2012). Sovremennyy bol’shoy gorod kak perekrestok mirov (virtual’noe vs. real’noe, verbal’noe vs. neverbal’noe, «svoe» vs. «chuzhoe») [A modern big city as a crossroads of worlds (virtual vs. real, verbal vs. non-verbal, “one’s own” vs. “alien”)]. In L. M. Terentiy, V. V. Krasnykh, & A. V. Kirilina (Eds.), Polifoniya bol’shogo goroda [Polyphony of a big city] (рр. 75‒83). MIL.
Kur’yanovich, A. V., Lyubertseva, I. A., & Novak, U. K. (2024). Regional urban street art in the mirror of native speaker reception (experience of linguodiscursive research). Tul’skiy nauchnyy vestnik. Seriya Istoriya. YAzykoznaniye ‒ Tula Scientific Bulletin. Series History. Linguistics, 1(17), 156–168. (In Russian). https:// doi.org/10.22405/2712-8407-2024-1-156-168
Kuznetsova, A. V., & Petrulevich I. A. (2019). Urban text: semiosis of the cultural code. Sotsial’no-gumanitarnyye znaniya ‒ Social and Humanitarian Knowledge, 11, 89‒95. (In Russian).
Lotman, Yu. M. (2000). Semiosfera [Semiosphere]. Iskusstvo‒SPb.
Mishankina, N. A. (2014). Linguistic corpus “Tomsk Regional Text”: Theoretical and methodological substantiation of the project. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ‒ Tomsk State University Journal, 389, 28‒37. (In Russian).
Orlova, O. V. (2015). The discourse of Tomsk rock authors as a fact of regional linguistic culture: study prospects. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya ‒ Tomsk State University Journal of Philology, 1(33), 16‒25. (In Russian).
Pirogov, S. V., Kashpur, V. V., & Dunayeva, D. O. (2022). Axiological component in the structure of visual images of the urban environment. PRAXĒMA. Problemy vizual’noy semiotiki ‒ PRAXĒMA. Journal of Visual Semiotics, 1(31), 75–89. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.23951/2312-7899-2022-1-75-89
Potanina, N. L., & Gololobov, M. A. (2012). Urban text as a theoretical problem. Filologicheskaya regionalistika ‒ Philological Regional Studies, 1(7), 32‒37. (In Russian).
Revyakina, N. P., & Kur’yanov, N. A. (2023). “The city as a text” (based on the material of the city of Rostov-on-Don). Russian Linguistic Bulletin ‒ Russian Linguistic Bulletin, 7(43). (In Russian). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18454/RULB.2023.43.30
Rezanova, Z. I. (2010). Mythologem “Tomsk – Siberian Athens” in communicative tactics of journalistic discourse (based on the material of weekly periodicals in Tomsk). Yazyk i kul’tura ‒ Language and Culture, 1, 74–84. (In Russian).
Rezanova, Z. I. (2012). Semiotic representation of national-cultural identity in the text of the city. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ‒ Tomsk State University Journal, 3, 19‒26. (In Russian).
Rezanova, Z. I., Yermolenkina, L. I., & Kostyashina, E. A. (2019). Kartiny russkogo mira: gorodskiye diskursy [Pictures of the Russian world: urban discourses]. Tomsk State University.
Sanatova, S. V. (2022). Varieties of art objects and their use in the urban environment. Iskusstvovedeniye i dizayn v sovremennom mire: traditsii i perspektivy [Art history and design in the modern world: traditions and prospects] Conference Proceedings. Izdatel’skiy dom «Derzhavinskiy». рр. 153‒157.
Ses, N. A., & Shchirova, A. N. (2012). Art object as a specific art form. Uspekhi sovremennogo yestestvoznaniya ‒ Advances in modern natural science, 5, 23–24. (In Russian).
Sitnikova, E. V. (2011). Wooden architecture of Tomsk in the second half of the 19th – early 20th centuries. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo arkhitekturno-stroitel’nogo universiteta, 1, 59–65. (In Russian).
Toporov, V. N. (1995). Mif. Ritual. Simvol. Obraz. Issledovaniya v oblasti mifopoeticheskogo [Myth. Ritual. Symbol. Image. Research in the field of the mythopoetic]. Progress.
Vityuk, E. Yu. (2012). Urban environment as an art object. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ‒ Tomsk State University Journal, 364, 43–48. (In Russian).
Yakovleva, E. A. (2011). Philological urbanology: new aspects of the study of the city. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo, 6(2), 771‒774. (In Russian).
Yermolenkina, L. I., Kostyashina, E. A., & Rezanova, Z. I. (2011). Tomskiy urbanistskiy tekst kak mekhanizm modelirovaniya sotsiokul’turnogo prostranstva goroda [Tomsk urban text as a mechanism for modeling the sociocultural space of the city]. Rol’ sovmestnykh konkursov RGNF i Administratsii Tomskoy oblasti v razvitii gumanitarnykh issledovaniy [The role of joint competitions of the Russian Humanitarian Fund and the Administration of Tomsk Oblast in the development of humanitarian research]. Conference Proceedings. Tomsk State University.
( 823.64 kB ) 
( 807.42 kB )
Issue: 3, 2024
Series of issue: Issue 3
Rubric: ARTICLES
Pages: 117 — 137
Downloads: 139