Praxema TSPU
  • RU
  • EN
Today: 16.08.2022
Home Issues 2019 Year Issue №2 GOOGLE’S CARS AND VISUAL RESISTANCE IN URBAN SPACE
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Issues
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
  • Rating
  • Search
  • About Publisher
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Council
  • Regular journal reviewers
  • Information for Authors
  • Peer-reviewing procedure
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Place article
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance

Journal TSPU

vestnik.tspu.edu.ru
praxema.tspu.edu.ru
ling.tspu.edu.ru
npo.tspu.edu.ru
edujournal.tspu.edu.ru

Яндекс.Метрика

Praxema Our partners

Journal on the history of ancient pedagogical culture
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -

GOOGLE’S CARS AND VISUAL RESISTANCE IN URBAN SPACE

Nahirny R.

DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2019-2-33-41

Information About Author:

Rafał Nahirny, University of Wroclaw, Poland. E-mail: rafal.nahirny@uwr.edu.pl

The article discusses how city residents react to the sight of Google cars taking pictures for the use of the Street View service? The author notes that the vast majority behaves completely normal as if the Google car was not even there. It is observed that some of the residents of the Street View world wave in a friendly manner towards the camera lens, some of them smile or take selfies with the vision machine passing by. However, there are some that opt for spontaneous gestures displaying displeasure at the presence of a nosy technology in their everyday space. The author creates an introductory typology of the methods of visual resistance and then proceeds with an analysis of specific strategies.

Keywords: Google Street View, urban space, vision machine, methods of resistance

References:

Bauman, Lyon 2012 - Bauman Z., Lyon D. Liquid Surveillance: A Conversation. Cambridge, Malden, 2012.

Critchley 2002 - Critchley S. On Humour. London, 2002.

Fletcher, Greenhill 2010 - Flechter G., Greenhill A. Photobombing: Mobility, Humor and Culture. Proceedings Cultural Attitudes Towards Communication and Technology. Ed. by F. Sudweeks, H. Hrachovec, C. Ess. Murdoch, 2010. P. 198-206.

Foucault 2012 - Foucault M. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Transl. into English by A. Sheridian. New York, 2012.

Hoelzl, Marie 2015 - Hoelzl I., Marie R. Softimage: Towards a New Theory of the Digital Image. Bristol, Chicago, 2015.

Ibrahim 2017 - Ibrahim Y. The Vernacular of Photobombing. The Aesthetics of Transgression. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies. 2017. November 27. URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1354856517743666

Simmel 2008 - Simmel G. Psychologia dyskrecji. Transl. into Polish by M. Łukasiewicz. Simmel G. Pisma socjologiczne. Ed. by H.-J. Dahme, O. Rammstedt. Warszawa, 2008. P. 174-181.

Steyerl 2009 - Steyerl H. In Defense of the Poor Image. E-Flux. 2009. № 10. URL: https://www.e-flux.com/journal/10/61362/in-defense-of-the-poor-image/

Virilio 1994 - Virilio P. The Vision Machine. Transl. into English by J. Rose. Bloomington, 1994.

nahirny_r._33_41_2_20_2019.pdf ( 294.47 kB ) nahirny_r._33_41_2_20_2019.zip ( 287.66 kB )

Issue: 2, 2019

Series of issue: Issue 2

Rubric: ARTICLES

Pages: 33 — 41

Downloads: 440

For citation:


© 2022 ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU