TIME REPRESENTATION IN SCIENTIFIC DIAGRAMS: GALILEO GALILEI’S SOLUTION TO THE PROBLEM OF THE MOTION OF A FALLING BODY
DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2021-4-58-80
The textbook narrative of the scientific revolution of the 17th century says that the early modern transformation of physics and mechanics was grounded in mathematization, that is, the application of mathematical principles and procedures to physical entities and events. However, such a transformation faces a major obstacle: compared to geometry, mechanics includes an additional dimension, namely, time. When temporality of motion is to be represented geometrically, a question arises on how a temporal succession can be expressed by a static image. The problem of representation of temporal events is not limited to science. In my paper, I apply a conceptual tool elaborated by Gregory Currie for the analysis of temporal representations in art, especially in cinema, to the analysis of scientific diagrams. In his book Image and Mind. Film, Philosophy, and Cognitive Science (1995), Currie distinguishes depictive and nondepictive representations, arguing that depictive representation requires similarity and homomorphism between an object ant its representation. Thus, it seems that any non-temporal image of temporal processes would lack the required similarity and cannot be a depictive representation. However, taking into account explanations given by Galileo Galilei for his famous diagrams of accelerated motion, I argue that the representation of time in scientific diagrams as a geometrical line is grounded in isomorphism between time as a continuous structure and continuous structure of a geometrical line. The main temporal process studied by mechanics is motion. Motion can be represented in two main ways: as a trajectory of a body over some period of time or as a functional relation of various parameters of motion (speed, path, acceleration) versus time. In the latter case, time is usually represented in a diagram as a geometrical line. We can find the origin of this type of representation in the late medieval doctrine of ‘intensio et remissio qualitatum’, intension and remission of qualities, in the context of which first diagrams representing intensity and extension of velocity of nonuniform motion as a changing quality over time were produced (Nicolas Oresme). We can find very similar graphical schemes in Galileo Galilei’s works, especially in Discorsi e dimostrazioni matematiche intorno a due nuove scienze (1638). In this work, Galileo announces with all clarity that he considers time to be the same aggregate of temporal moments as a line is an aggregate of points: every moment of time has a corresponding point on the geometrical line. This allows us to establish a homomorphic similarity between temporal duration and spatial (geometrical) extension. Thus, the essential requirement for depictive representation is met. Concluding, I have to point out that the homomorphic relation in this case is established between not real but abstract entities. The visible line itself is a representation of non-visible abstract geometrical line; in the same way, time consisting of non-divisible moments is just an abstract construction which refers to physical of psychological time-duration. However, the established relation between abstract time and abstract geometrical lines is a grounding event of the modern physical science.
Keywords: Galileo Galilei, history of early modern science, representations of temporal dimension, scientific diagrams
References:
Arthur, R. T. W. (2016). On the mathematization of free fall: Galileo, Descartes, and a history of misconstrual. The Language of Nature. Reassessing the Mathematization of Natural Philosophy in the Seventeenth Century. Minessota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 20. https://manifold.umn.edu/read/untitled-7ca18210-217d-40f2-83fe-b0add1d84ede/section/bb88e7f4-7451-4b26-9056-a21f51f49091
Currie, G. (1995). Image and mind. Film, philosophy, and cognitive science. Cambridge University Press.
Damerow, P., et al. (2004). Exploring the limits of preclassical mechanics: A study of conceptual development in early modern science: Free fall and compounded motion in the work of Descartes, Galileo, and Beeckman. 2nd edition. Springer.
Gaidenko, P. P. (2003). Vremya. Dlitel’nost’. Vechnost’. Problema vremeni v evropeyskoy filosofii i nauke [Time. Duration. Eternity. Problem of time in European philosophy and science]. Progress-Traditsiya.
Galilei, G. (1898). Le opere. Edizione nazionale (Vol. VIII). Barbera.
Galilei, G. (1964). Besedy i matematicheskie dokazatel’stva, kasayushchiesya dvukh novykh otrasley nauki [Discourses and mathematical demonstrations concerning to two new sciences]. In G. Galilei, Izbrannye trudy v 2-kh tomakh [Selected Works in 2 volumes] (Vol. 2.). Nauka.
Greaves, M. (2002). The philosophical status of diagrams. CSLI Publications.
Koyré, A. (1966). Études galiléennes. Hermann.
Le Podevin, R. (2007). The images of time. An essay on temporal representation. Oxford University Press.
Lemanski, J. (2016). Means or end? Eulerian-diagrams in the history of modern philosophy. Logiko-filosofskie shtudii, 13(2), 98–121.
Palmerino, C.R. (2010). The geometrization of motion: Galileo’s triangle of speed and its various transformations. Early Science and Medicine, 15(4–5), 410–447.
Plato. (2007). Works in 4 volumes (Vol 3(1)). Saint Petersburg State University. (In Russian).
Roby, C. A. (2016). Diagrams. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Classics. http://classics.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199381135.001.0001/acrefore-9780199381135-e-7021
Roby, C. A. (2018). Technical illustrations. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Classics. http://classics.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199381135.001.0001/acrefore-9780199381135-e-8164
Schemmel, M. (2008). The English Galileo: Thomas Harriot’s work on motion as an example of preclassical mechanics. Springer.
Shin, S.-J. (1994). The logical status of diagrams. Cambridge University Press.
Yushkevich, A. P. (1966). O razvitii ponyatiya funktsii [On the development of the conception of function]. In G. F. Rybkin, & A. P. Yushkevich (Eds.), Istoriko-matematicheskie issledovaniya [Studies in history of mathematics]. Nauka.
Zubov, V. P. (2000). Predislovie: Traktat Nikolaya Orema «O konfiguratsii kachestv» [Introduction to N. Oresme’s treatise “De Configuratione Qualitatum”]. In N. Oresme, O konfiguratsii kachestv [De Configuratione Qualitatum](pp. 5–39). URSS.
( 572.59 kB ) 
( 553.93 kB )
Issue: 4, 2021
Series of issue: Issue 4
Rubric: ARTICLES
Pages: 58 — 80
Downloads: 571