THE ENIGMA OF THE CHURCH OF KIRENSK: TRADITIONALITY VS EXCLUSIVITY. THE IMAGE AND SYMBOL STRUCTURE IN THE ARCHITECTURE OF ORTHODOX CHURCHES
DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2022-1-153-170
The essay reports how the solution to the problem of the traditionality and exclusivity of the image and symbol structure of the Orthodox church architecture is shown using the example of a church in the name of St. Nicholas the Wonderworker of the Holy Trinity Monastery of Irkutsk Eparchy, built in Kirensk in the 18th century. Jérôme Baschet’s methodological technique of searching for the traditional and the exceptional, which he applied to the analysis of medieval art, was used. For the first time, a relational approach is proposed in the study of architecture, implying the identification of the typological class of a building, the search for analogs or sources of the image of its structure. Attention is focused on issues of localization, prevalence, concretization of the embodiment of the building’s features. It has been established that the church can be characterized as a wooden tiered three-part gate monastery church, but there is no direct analogue of the church. The architecture of the Kirensk church has some features inherent in wooden three-part, three-part tiered, and gate monastery churches; it has an original volumetric planning solution. The semantics of the church is associated with its belonging to gate monastery temples, which are the border between the consecrated space of the monastery and the profane neighborhood. In its tiered forms, one sees an analogy to Heavenly Jerusalem, and the altar dedicated to St. Nicholas has a protective symbolism in a broad sense. The appearance of the church is similar to defensive structures, such as the towers of the Siberian fortresses and European castles. Several signs allow admitting the similarity of the forms of the church with Ukrainian baroque architecture, Petrine baroque, Gothic architecture of Russia and the Carpathian region. The traditional features of the church include the fulfillment of liturgical requirements – three parts; semantics, including the symbolism of the consecration of the altar, the protective function, the embodiment of the image of Heavenly Jerusalem, an appeal to the historical past; use of well-known materials, designs, and shapes. Traditionality in church architecture is associated with the sacred sphere and basic building techniques, and exclusivity with the visual component of architecture (proportions, metrology, interpretation of forms and structures). It is concluded that the criterion for the traditionality of church architecture is the prevalence of forms, symbols, images of temples in any territory in a certain era due to the preference for choosing combinations of structures and semantics. Exclusivity is provided by the variability of forms, which allows creating an original image system. The very possibility of variations, the use of new and individual techniques, the author’s reading of the building’s features, which fits into the framework of the regulations noted in the sacred books where the boundaries of the canon were not strictly delineated, can be attributed to the important features of the traditionality of Russian Orthodox architecture. The architecture of the Kirensk church combines the features of traditionality and exclusivity; it is a rare example of Orthodox church architecture, its figurative structure was not supported in the further development of Siberian architecture.
Keywords: image and symbol structure, semantics of architecture, Orthodox churches, traditionality, exclusivity, three-part churches, tiered churches, gate monastic churches, St. Nicholas Church, Kirensk, Siberia
References:
Aronova, A. A. (2001). Russkaya arkhitekturnaya praktika nachala XVIII veka v svete gollandskikh vpechatleniy velikogo posol’stva [Russian architectural practice of the early 18th century in the light of the Dutch impressions of the great embassy]. Gosudarstvennye muzei Moskovskogo Kremlya. Materialy i issledovaniya, XII, 1–9.
Avanesov, S. S. (2018). Gate church in the structure of urban space: Semantics and typology. Balandinskie chteniya – Balandin Readings, XIII, 102–104. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.24411/9999-001А-2018-10016
Batalov, A. L. (2014). Evropeyskie arkhitektory i voennye spetsialisty na sluzhbe Ivana IV v svete pis’mennykh istochnikov: eshche raz ob istorii Gansa Shlitte [European architects and military specialists in the service of Ivan IV in the light of written sources: once again about the history of Hans Schlitte]. Muzei Moskovskogo kremlya. Materialy i issledovaniya, 22, 8–32.
Belikov, D. N. (1898). Starinnye monastyri Tomskogo kraya [Ancient monasteries of the Tomsk region]. Parovaya Tipo-Litografiya P.I. Makushina.
Belykh, E. (2002). Letopis’ Kirenskogo Svyato-Troitskogo monastyrya Irkutskoy eparkhii (26 aprelya 1900 god) [Chronicle of the Kirensk Holy Trinity Monastery of Irkutsk Eparchy (April 26, 1900)]. Zemlya Irkutskaya, 3, 20–21.
Chuvorkina, O. A. (2012). New in the study of medieval iconography. Artikult, 8(4), 53–58. (In Russian).
Fast, G., & Maciel Sanchez, L. K. (2013). Eniseyskiy v chest’ Preobrazheniya Gospodnya muzhskoy monastyr’ [Yenisei monastery in honor of the Transfiguration of the Lord]. Orthodox Encyclopedia. https://www.pravenc.ru/text/189971.html
Gromov, M. N. (2015). Drevnyaya Rus’ kak osnovanie otechestvennoy gosudarstvennosti i kul’tury [Old Rus as the basis of national statehood and culture]. In V. M. Kirillin (Ed.), Drevnyaya Rus’: prostranstvo knizhnogo slova. Istoriko-filologicheskie issledovaniya [Old Rus: The space of the book word. Historical and philological studies] (pp. 498–512). Yazyki kul’turnogo slova.
Kalinina, I. (1999). Tserkov’ Kirenskogo monastyrya [Church of the Kirensk Monastery]. Zemlya Irkutskaya, 11, 36–40.
Kalinina, I. V. (2000). Pravoslavnye khramy Irkutskoy eparkhii. XVII – nachalo XX veka [Orthodox churches of Irkutsk Eparchy. 18th – early 20th centuries]. Galart.
Kaptikov, A. Yu. (2015). Baroque architecture in Western and Eastern Siberia: An experience of comparative analysis. Akademicheskiy vestnik URALNIIPROEKT RAASN, 1, 19–27. (In Russian).
Kharlampovich, K. (1914). Malorossiyskoe vliyanie na velikorusskuyu tserkovnuyu zhizn’ [Little Russia’s influence on the Great Russian church life] (vol. 1). Izd. knizhn. mag. M.A. Golubeva.
Lebedev, L., archpriest. (1983). Pravoslavnyy khram, bogosluzheniya, utvar’ i odeyaniya dukhovenstva [Orthodox church, divine services, utensils and vestments of the clergy]. In Nastol’naya kniga svyashchennosluzhitelya [Handbook of the priest] (vol. 4, pp. 7–157). Moscow Patriarchy.
Lidov, A. M. (2005). Obraz Nebesnogo Ierusalima v vostochnokhristianskoy ikonografii [The image of Heavenly Jerusalem in Eastern Christian iconography]. RusArch. http://rusarch.ru/lidov1.htm
Mainicheva, A. Yu. (2005a). Tserkvi vo imya svyatitelya Nikolaya Chudotvortsa: “Prizyvayushchim ego pomogaet i ot bed izbavlyaet…” [Churches in the name of St. Nicholas the Wonderworker: “He helps those who call him and relieves them of troubles ...”]. In Problemy transmissii i bytovaniya etnokul’turnykh traditsiy slavyanskogo naseleniya Sibiri XVIII–XX vv. [Problems of transmission and existence of the ethnocultural traditions of the Slavic population of Siberia in the 18th–20th centuries] (pp. 48–64). IAET SB RAS.
Mainicheva, A. Yu. (2005b). Tserkvi Tobol’skoy eparkhii (po spravochnym materialam nachala XX v.) [Churches of Tobolsk Eparchy (based on reference materials of the early 20th century)]. In Problemy arkheologii, etnografii, antropologii Sibiri i sopredel’nykh territoriy: Materialy Godovoy sessii Instituta arkheologii i etnografii SO RAN 2005 g. [Problems of archeology, ethnography, anthropology of Siberia and adjacent territories: Materials of the Annual session of the Institute of Archeology and Ethnography of the SB RAS 2005] (vol. 11(2), pp. 122–126). IAET SB RAS.
Ponomarev, N. A. (2007). Poezdka Preosvyashchennogo Episkopa Evgeniya v Kirenskiy uezd v iyune–iyule mesyatsakh 1913 g. [The trip of His Grace Bishop Eugene to the Kirensk district in June–July 1913]. Irkutsk: Tal’tsy.
Putyatin, I. E. (2009). On the chronology and ideology of the Russian “Gothic” of the 18th century. Academia, 3, 54–56. (In Russian).
Serebrennikov, I. I. (1915). Pamyatniki starinnogo derevyannogo zodchestva v Irkutskoy gubernii [Monuments of ancient wooden architecture in Irkutsk Province]. Parovaya tipografiya I.P. Kazantseva.
Shemelina, D. S. (2011). The architecture of the defensive lines of Siberia in the 18th century: Relationships with the creative heritage of Sebastian de Vauban. Trudy Gosudarstvennogo muzeya istorii S.-Peterburga – Proceedings of the State Museum of the History of St. Petersburg, 21, 16–31. (In Russian).
Shemelina, D. S. (2015). On the role of German military engineers in the creation of fortresses along the Siberian defensive lines of the 18th century. Balandinskie chteniya – Balandin readings, X(I), 74–86. http://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24093563 (In Russian).
Tarasov, A. E. (2015). Temples of the Ivangorod fortress: To the history of the Nikolskoe and Assumption cults in Russia. In Rus’, Rossiya: Srednevekov’e i Novoe vremya [Rus, Russia: The Middle Ages and the New Time] (vol. 4). Proceedings of the International Conference. Moscow State University.
Tsapenko, M. P. (1967). Arkhitektura Levoberezhnoy Ukrainy XVII–XVIII vekov [Architecture of the Left-Bank Ukraine of the 17th–18th centuries]. Stroyizdat.
UNESCO. (n.d.). List of UNESCO World Heritage Sites under the section “Wooden Churches of the Carpathian Region of Poland and Ukraine”. https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1424
Zabello, S., Ivanov, V., & Maksimov, P. (1942). Russkoe derevyannoe zodchestvo [Russian wooden architecture]. Moscow.
Zagraevsky, S. V. (2016). Metodologicheskie problemy izucheniya kanona, simvoliki i proportsiy v pravoslavnoy khramovoy arkhitekture [Methodological problems of studying the canon, symbolism and proportions in Orthodox church architecture]. RusArch. http://rusarch.ru/zagraevsky48.htm
Issue: 1, 2022
Series of issue: Issue 1
Rubric: ARTICLES
Pages: 153 — 170
Downloads: 507